Literature DB >> 23912267

A randomised prospective evaluation of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patients with primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jang-Won Park, Sourabh S Kulkarni, Yoon-Hong Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Very few studies have compared alumina-on-alumina ceramic and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patient. The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results and the prevalence of osteolysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty using an alumina-on-alumina and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in young active patients.
METHODS: We prospectively compared the results of 100 patients (200 hips) who had undergone a cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in one hip and an alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene in the other. There were 66 men and 34 women with a mean age of 45.3 years (range, 21-49 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 12.4 years (range, 11-13 years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at three months, one year, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: Harris hip, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups of bearings preoperatively or at the time of final follow-up. Radiographic findings of the component were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean polyethylene linear penetration was 0.031 ± 0.004 mm per year. No hips in either group displayed osteolysis. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision as the end point at 12.4 years was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-100%) for the femoral component in both groups and 99% (95%CI, 93-100%) for the acetabular component.
CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiographic results of using an alumina-on-alumina ceramic and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings were similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912267      PMCID: PMC3824907          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  39 in total

1.  Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses.

Authors:  M Endo; J L Tipper; D C Barton; M H Stone; E Ingham; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin E Bierbaum; James Nairus; Daniel Kuesis; J Craig Morrison; Daniel Ward
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. Association with and prediction of osteolysis.

Authors:  J E Dowd; C J Sychterz; A M Young; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A comparison of polyethylene wear in hips with cobalt-chrome or zirconia heads. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Y H Kim; J S Kim; S H Cho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-07

8.  Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Seventeen to twenty-one-year results.

Authors:  J A Urban; K L Garvin; C K Boese; L Bryson; D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan; R K Miller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip prostheses in patients 40 years of age or younger.

Authors:  P Bizot; L Banallec; L Sedel; R Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Seung-Hwan Oh; Ju-Moon Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  12 in total

1.  Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years.

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Tyler C White; Anand Dusad; Curtis W Hartman; John Martell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Delay of total hip arthroplasty to advanced stage worsens post-operative hip motion in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Woo-Lam Jo; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Tae-Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Jose H Jimenez-Almonte; Mohammad H Murad; German A Norambuena-Morales; Miguel E Cabanela; Rafael J Sierra; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Gender Differences in Wear Rates for 28- vs 32-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads on Modern Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at Midterm Follow-Up in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; Gail Pashos; Ningying Wu; Jacob A Haynes; John M Martell; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Dangfeng Zhang; Hui Du; Heng Du; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 6.  Ceramic on Ceramic or Ceramic-on-polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies.

Authors:  Yu-Lei Dong; Tao Li; Ke Xiao; Yan-Yan Bian; Xi-Sheng Weng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 8.  Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature.

Authors:  Peter D H Wall; Bethan L Richards; Andrew Sprowson; Rachelle Buchbinder; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-30

9.  Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: What is the evidence?

Authors:  Didier Hannouche; Matthieu Zingg; Hermes Miozzari; Remy Nizard; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Xiaobin Shang; Yan Fang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.