BACKGROUND: Developing a round-the-clock artificial pancreas requires accurate and stable continuous glucose monitoring. The most widely used continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are percutaneous, with the sensor residing in the interstitial space. Inaccuracies in percutaneous CGM readings during periods of lying on the devices (e.g., in various sleeping positions) have been anecdotally reported but not systematically studied. METHODS: In order to assess the impact of sleep and sleep position on CGM performance, we conducted a study in human subjects in which we measured the variability of interstitial CGM data at night as a function of sleeping position. Commercially available sensors were placed for 4 days in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue in healthy, nondiabetic volunteers (four sensors per person, two per side). Nocturnal sleeping position was determined from video recordings and correlated to sensor data. RESULTS: We observed that, although the median of the four sensor readings was typically 70-110 mg/dl during sleep, individual sensors intermittently exhibited aberrant glucose readings (>25 mg/dl away from median) and that these aberrant readings were strongly correlated with subjects lying on the sensors. We expected and observed that most of these aberrant sleep-position-related CGM readings were sudden decreases in reported glucose values, presumably due to local blood-flow decreases caused by tissue compression. Curiously, in rare cases, the aberrant CGM readings were elevated values. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight limitations in our understanding of interstitial fluid physiology in the subcutaneous space and have significant implications for the utilization of sensors in the construction of an artificial pancreas.
BACKGROUND: Developing a round-the-clock artificial pancreas requires accurate and stable continuous glucose monitoring. The most widely used continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are percutaneous, with the sensor residing in the interstitial space. Inaccuracies in percutaneous CGM readings during periods of lying on the devices (e.g., in various sleeping positions) have been anecdotally reported but not systematically studied. METHODS: In order to assess the impact of sleep and sleep position on CGM performance, we conducted a study in human subjects in which we measured the variability of interstitial CGM data at night as a function of sleeping position. Commercially available sensors were placed for 4 days in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue in healthy, nondiabetic volunteers (four sensors per person, two per side). Nocturnal sleeping position was determined from video recordings and correlated to sensor data. RESULTS: We observed that, although the median of the four sensor readings was typically 70-110 mg/dl during sleep, individual sensors intermittently exhibited aberrant glucose readings (>25 mg/dl away from median) and that these aberrant readings were strongly correlated with subjects lying on the sensors. We expected and observed that most of these aberrant sleep-position-related CGM readings were sudden decreases in reported glucose values, presumably due to local blood-flow decreases caused by tissue compression. Curiously, in rare cases, the aberrant CGM readings were elevated values. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight limitations in our understanding of interstitial fluid physiology in the subcutaneous space and have significant implications for the utilization of sensors in the construction of an artificial pancreas.
Authors: Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Stacey Anderson; Marc Breton; Stephen Patek; William Clarke; Daniela Bruttomesso; Alberto Maran; Silvana Costa; Angelo Avogaro; Chiara Dalla Man; Andrea Facchinetti; Lalo Magni; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Jerome Place; Anne Farret Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-11-01
Authors: Nelly Mauras; Roy W Beck; Katrina J Ruedy; Craig Kollman; William V Tamborlane; H Peter Chase; Bruce A Buckingham; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Andrea D Booth; Dongyuan Xing Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: T W Jones; P Porter; R S Sherwin; E A Davis; P O'Leary; F Frazer; G Byrne; S Stick; W V Tamborlane Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samantha C Puglisi; Alexis L Mackiewicz; Amir Ardeshir; Laura M Garzel; Kari L Christe Journal: Comp Med Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Nihat Baysal; Fraser Cameron; Bruce A Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson; H Peter Chase; David M Maahs; B Wayne Bequette Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2014-10-14
Authors: Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2020-09-28
Authors: Daniel Lee; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Amanda Sheehan; Alexa Puleio; Christopher M Mulla; Mary Elizabeth Patti Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958