Literature DB >> 23897506

What causes unexplained pain in patients with metal-on metal hip devices? A retrieval, histologic, and imaging analysis.

Danyal H Nawabi1, Nader A Nassif, Huong T Do, Kirsten Stoner, Marcella Elpers, Edwin P Su, Timothy Wright, Hollis G Potter, Douglas E Padgett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse tissue reactions associated with metal-on-metal (MOM) hips are common in resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty (THA) designs. The etiology of these reactions in painful, well-positioned arthroplasties is inconsistently described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to compare the (1) articular wear rates; (2) histologic findings; (3) synovial response on MRI; and (4) graded intraoperative tissue damage between well-positioned, MOM hips revised for unexplained pain and MOM hips revised for other reasons and to (5) determine whether the presence of a taper junction on a MOM articulation affects these four parameters in unexplained pain.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 88 patients (94 hips) who had undergone revision of either a hip resurfacing or a large-head (> 36 mm) THA. Thirty-five hips revised for unexplained pain were compared with a control group of 59 hips revised for other causes. Articular wear was measured using three-dimensional contactless metrology and histologic analysis was performed using the aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) score. Preoperative MRI was performed on 57 patients to determine synovial volumes and thicknesses. Tissue damage was graded from intraoperative reports.
RESULTS: Articular wear rates in the unexplained pain group were lower than in the control group (median 2.6 μm/year versus 12.8 μm/year, p < 0.001). Sixty-six percent of patients in the unexplained pain group had histologic confirmation of ALVAL compared with 19% in the control group (p < 0.001). The synovial thickness on MRI was higher in the unexplained pain group (p = 0.04) and was highly predictive of ALVAL. Severe intraoperative tissue damage was noted in more cases in the unexplained pain group (p = 0.01). There were no differences in articular wear, histology, MRI, and tissue damage between resurfacings and THAs revised for unexplained pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Unexplained pain in patients with well-positioned MOM hips warrants further investigation with MRI to look for features predictive of ALVAL. Tissue destruction in these cases does not appear to be related to high bearing wear or the presence of a taper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23897506      PMCID: PMC3890159          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3199-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.

Authors:  Jay R Goldberg; Jeremy L Gilbert; Joshua J Jacobs; Thomas W Bauer; Wayne Paprosky; Sue Leurgans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Li Foong Foo
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

4.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Afshin Fayyazi; Renata Flury; Markus Windler; Georg Köster; Christoph H Lohmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Nikolaus Streich; Michael Krachler; Eike Jakubowitz; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Stephanie Gold; Steven Lyman; Kara Fields; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

9.  Dose-dependent cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt nanoparticles and ions on macrophages in vitro.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Zhidao Xia; Sion Glyn-Jones; David Beard; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.715

10.  Presence of corrosion products and hypersensitivity-associated reactions in periprosthetic tissue after aseptic loosening of total hip replacements with metal bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Monika Huber; Georg Reinisch; Günter Trettenhahn; Karl Zweymüller; Felix Lintner
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  20 in total

1.  Arthroprosthetic cobaltism and pseudotumour also occur in patients with small diameter femoral ball head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Florian Witt; Turgay Efe; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-28

Review 2.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can wear explain the histological variation around metal-on-metal total hips?

Authors:  Edward Ebramzadeh; Patricia Campbell; Timothy L Tan; Scott D Nelson; Sophia N Sangiorgio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights®: Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Timothy M Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Value of multidetector computed tomography for the differentiation of delayed aseptic and septic complications after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jaime Isern-Kebschull; Xavier Tomas; Ana Isabel García-Díez; Laura Morata; Ignacio Moya; José Ríos; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Christina Esposito; Parina Shah; Mauro Miranda; Elexis Baral; Kara Fields; Thomas Bauer; Douglas E Padgett; Timothy Wright; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  What are the current clinical issues in wear and tribocorrosion?

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Do retrieval analysis and blood metal measurements contribute to our understanding of adverse local tissue reactions?

Authors:  Patricia A Campbell; Michael S Kung; Andrew R Hsu; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Histological characterization of periprosthetic tissue responses for metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Eual A Phillips; Gregg R Klein; Harold E Cates; Steven M Kurtz; Marla Steinbeck
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.