Literature DB >> 28760952

Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.

Trent E Balius1, Marcus Fischer1, Reed M Stein2, Thomas B Adler1, Crystal N Nguyen3, Anthony Cruz4,5, Michael K Gilson3, Tom Kurtzman4,5,6, Brian K Shoichet7.   

Abstract

Binding-site water is often displaced upon ligand recognition, but is commonly neglected in structure-based ligand discovery. Inhomogeneous solvation theory (IST) has become popular for treating this effect, but it has not been tested in controlled experiments at atomic resolution. To do so, we turned to a grid-based version of this method, GIST, readily implemented in molecular docking. Whereas the term only improves docking modestly in retrospective ligand enrichment, it could be added without disrupting performance. We thus turned to prospective docking of large libraries to investigate GIST's impact on ligand discovery, geometry, and water structure in a model cavity site well-suited to exploring these terms. Although top-ranked docked molecules with and without the GIST term often overlapped, many ligands were meaningfully prioritized or deprioritized; some of these were selected for testing. Experimentally, 13/14 molecules prioritized by GIST did bind, whereas none of the molecules that it deprioritized were observed to bind. Nine crystal complexes were determined. In six, the ligand geometry corresponded to that predicted by GIST, for one of these the pose without the GIST term was wrong, and three crystallographic poses differed from both predictions. Notably, in one structure, an ordered water molecule with a high GIST displacement penalty was observed to stay in place. Inclusion of this water-displacement term can substantially improve the hit rates and ligand geometries from docking screens, although the magnitude of its effects can be small and its impact in drug binding sites merits further controlled studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  docking; inhomogeneous solvation theory; ligand discovery; structure-based drug design; water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760952      PMCID: PMC5565424          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703287114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  Structure-based ligand discovery for the protein-protein interface of chemokine receptor CXCR4.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Dahlia R Weiss; Joshua J Ziarek; Stéphanie Gravel; Allison K Doak; Joel Karpiak; Nikolaus Heveker; Brian K Shoichet; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid context-dependent ligand desolvation in molecular docking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Evaluation of Host-Guest Binding Thermodynamics of Model Cavities with Grid Cell Theory.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Richard H Henchman; Georgios Gerogiokas; Michelle W Y Southey; Michael P Mazanetz; Richard J Law
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Tom Young; Ramy Farid; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.

Authors:  Matthew P Repasky; Robert B Murphy; Jay L Banks; Jeremy R Greenwood; Ivan Tubert-Brohman; Sathesh Bhat; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril.

Authors:  Crystal N Nguyen; Tom Kurtzman Young; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Exploiting ordered waters in molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery.

Authors:  Marcus Fischer; Ryan G Coleman; James S Fraser; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 24.427

View more
  20 in total

1.  Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Tom Kurtzman; Ross C Walker; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Leveraging structural and 2D-QSAR to investigate the role of functional group substitutions, conserved surface residues and desolvation in triggering the small molecule-induced dimerization of hPD-L1.

Authors:  Marawan Ahmed; Aravindhan Ganesan; Khaled Barakat
Journal:  BMC Chem       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Solvation Structure and Thermodynamic Mapping (SSTMap): An Open-Source, Flexible Package for the Analysis of Water in Molecular Dynamics Trajectories.

Authors:  Kamran Haider; Anthony Cruz; Steven Ramsey; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Role of Displacing Confined Solvent in the Conformational Equilibrium of β-Cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Peng He; Sheila Sarkar; Emilio Gallicchio; Tom Kurtzman; Lauren Wickstrom
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Structural identification of a hotspot on CFTR for potentiation.

Authors:  Fangyu Liu; Zhe Zhang; Anat Levit; Jesper Levring; Kouki K Touhara; Brian K Shoichet; Jue Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Thermodynamic Decomposition of Solvation Free Energies with Particle Mesh Ewald and Long-Range Lennard-Jones Interactions in Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory.

Authors:  Lieyang Chen; Anthony Cruz; Daniel R Roe; Andrew C Simmonett; Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Tom Kurtzman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.

Authors:  Reed M Stein; Ying Yang; Trent E Balius; Matt J O'Meara; Jiankun Lyu; Jennifer Young; Khanh Tang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.

Authors:  Anna S Kamenik; Isha Singh; Parnian Lak; Trent E Balius; Klaus R Liedl; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ligand design by targeting a binding site water.

Authors:  Pierre Matricon; R Rama Suresh; Zhan-Guo Gao; Nicolas Panel; Kenneth A Jacobson; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Macrocycle Cell Permeability Measured by Solvation Free Energies in Polar and Apolar Environments.

Authors:  Anna S Kamenik; Johannes Kraml; Florian Hofer; Franz Waibl; Patrick K Quoika; Ursula Kahler; Michael Schauperl; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.