Literature DB >> 11484218

What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

C N Schutz1, A Warshel.   

Abstract

Implicit models for evaluation of electrostatic energies in proteins include dielectric constants that represent effect of the protein environment. Unfortunately, the results obtained by such models are very sensitive to the value used for the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the factors that determine the optimal value of these constants are far from being obvious. This review considers the meaning of the protein dielectric constants and the ways to determine their optimal values. It is pointed out that typical benchmarks for validation of electrostatic models cannot discriminate between consistent and inconsistent models. In particular, the observed pK(a) values of surface groups can be reproduced correctly by models with entirely incorrect physical features. Thus, we introduce a discriminative benchmark that only includes residues whose pK(a) values are shifted significantly from their values in water. We also use the semimacroscopic version of the protein dipole Langevin dipole (PDLD/S) formulation to generate a series of models that move gradually from microscopic to fully macroscopic models. These include the linear response version of the PDLD/S models, Poisson Boltzmann (PB)-type models, and Tanford Kirkwwod (TK)-type models. Using our different models and the discriminative benchmark, we show that the protein dielectric constant, epsilon(p), is not a universal constant but simply a parameter that depends on the model used. It is also shown in agreement with our previous works that epsilon(p) represents the factors that are not considered explicitly. The use of a discriminative benchmark appears to help not only in identifying nonphysical models but also in analyzing effects that are not reproduced in an accurate way by consistent models. These include the effect of water penetration and the effect of the protein reorganization. Finally, we show that the optimal dielectric constant for self-energies is not the optimal constant for charge-charge interactions. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11484218     DOI: 10.1002/prot.1106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  251 in total

1.  Conducting-state properties of the KcsA potassium channel from molecular and Brownian dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Shin-Ho Chung; Toby W Allen; Serdar Kuyucak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Distance dependence and salt sensitivity of pairwise, coulombic interactions in a protein.

Authors:  Kelly K Lee; Carolyn A Fitch; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Functional properties of threefold and fourfold channels in ferritin deduced from electrostatic calculations.

Authors:  Takuya Takahashi; Serdar Kuyucak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Role of the dielectric constants of membrane proteins and channel water in ion permeation.

Authors:  Turgut Baştuğ; Serdar Kuyucak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations of biological molecules.

Authors:  I V Leontyev; A A Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Electron transfer pathways in a multiheme cytochrome MtrF.

Authors:  Hiroshi C Watanabe; Yuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Ishikita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  What really prevents proton transport through aquaporin? Charge self-energy versus proton wire proposals.

Authors:  Anton Burykin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Converting conformational changes to electrostatic energy in molecular motors: The energetics of ATP synthase.

Authors:  Marek Strajbl; Avital Shurki; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effect of mutation of carboxyl side-chain amino acids near the heme on the midpoint potentials and ligand binding constants of nitrophorin 2 and its NO, histamine, and imidazole complexes.

Authors:  Robert E Berry; Maxim N Shokhirev; Arthur Y W Ho; Fei Yang; Tatiana K Shokhireva; Hongjun Zhang; Andrzej Weichsel; William R Montfort; F Ann Walker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  On the importance of atomic fluctuations, protein flexibility, and solvent in ion permeation.

Authors:  Toby W Allen; O S Andersen; Benoit Roux
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.