Literature DB >> 24015114

Calculating the sensitivity and robustness of binding free energy calculations to force field parameters.

Gabriel J Rocklin1, David L Mobley, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

Binding free energy calculations offer a thermodynamically rigorous method to compute protein-ligand binding, and they depend on empirical force fields with hundreds of parameters. We examined the sensitivity of computed binding free energies to the ligand's electrostatic and van der Waals parameters. Dielectric screening and cancellation of effects between ligand-protein and ligand-solvent interactions reduce the parameter sensitivity of binding affinity by 65%, compared with interaction strengths computed in the gas-phase. However, multiple changes to parameters combine additively on average, which can lead to large changes in overall affinity from many small changes to parameters. Using these results, we estimate that random, uncorrelated errors in force field nonbonded parameters must be smaller than 0.02 e per charge, 0.06 Å per radius, and 0.01 kcal/mol per well depth in order to obtain 68% (one standard deviation) confidence that a computed affinity for a moderately-sized lead compound will fall within 1 kcal/mol of the true affinity, if these are the only sources of error considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  force fields; free energy calculations; ligand binding; molecular dynamics; parameter sensitivity

Year:  2013        PMID: 24015114      PMCID: PMC3763860          DOI: 10.1021/ct400315q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  37 in total

Review 1.  What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Authors:  C N Schutz; A Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit.

Authors:  Sander Pronk; Szilárd Páll; Roland Schulz; Per Larsson; Pär Bjelkmar; Rossen Apostolov; Michael R Shirts; Jeremy C Smith; Peter M Kasson; David van der Spoel; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Molecular dynamics studies on peroxidases: a structural model for horseradish peroxidase and a substrate adduct.

Authors:  L Banci; P Carloni; G G Savellini
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-10-18       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking: how reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Fragment-based error estimation in biomolecular modeling.

Authors:  John C Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Extensive all-atom Monte Carlo sampling and QM/MM corrections in the SAMPL4 hydration free energy challenge.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ana I Cabedo Martinez; Michael P Criddle; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Quantitative Assessment of the Energetics of Dopamine Translocation by Human Dopamine Transporter.

Authors:  Mary Hongying Cheng; Cihan Kaya; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.

Authors:  Saeed Izadi; Boris Aguilar; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Optimized Lennard-Jones Parameters for Druglike Small Molecules.

Authors:  Eliot Boulanger; Lei Huang; Chetan Rupakheti; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Assessing the potential of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to probe reversible protein-protein recognition and binding.

Authors:  Luciano A Abriata; Matteo Dal Peraro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  One Size Does Not Fit All: The Limits of Structure-Based Models in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Gregory A Ross; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Alexander Heifetz; Michael J Bodkin; Stefan Knapp; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 9.825

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.