Literature DB >> 1457542

Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiography: a signal-to-noise analysis.

C C Shaw1, D Gur.   

Abstract

Dual-energy subtraction imaging techniques allow the tissue and bone structures in the patient to be visualized and studied in two separate images, thus removing the obscurity associated with overlapping of the two structures. In addition, they allow the subtraction image signals to be used for quantifying the tissue and bone thicknesses. Thus, capability for dual-energy subtraction imaging is often incorporated with new digital radiography systems. There are three different approaches to dual-energy image subtraction imaging techniques. Among them, the dual-kilovolt (peak) [kV(p)] and sandwich detector techniques have been two widely used approaches. A third approach is the single-kV(p) dual-filter technique, which allows some flexible control of the spectra while avoiding the technical complexity of kV(p) value switching in slit-scan imaging. In this report, the noise properties associated with these three techniques are studied and compared by computing the noise variances in the subtraction image signals as a function of the kV(p) values and filter thicknesses. It was found that the dual-kVp technique results in the least noisy subtraction images, whereas the dual-filter technique results in slightly less noisy subtraction images than the sandwich detector technique. Following optimization of the kV(p) value and filter thicknesses, the dual-filter and sandwich detector techniques result in a noise level of approximately three and four times higher than that resulted from the dual-kV(p) technique, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1457542     DOI: 10.1007/bf03167808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography.

Authors:  B K Stewart; H K Huang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications.

Authors:  J W Oestmann; R Greene; J T Rhea; H Rosenthal; R M Koenker; C L Tillotson; K D Pearsen; J W Hill; R H Velaj
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Dual-energy projection radiography using condenser x-ray generator and digital radiography apparatus.

Authors:  H Nishitani; Y Umezu; K Ogawa; H Yuzuriha; H Tanaka; K Matsuura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A fast dual-energy computational method using isotransmission lines and table lookup.

Authors:  K S Chuang; H K Huang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effects of scattered radiation and veiling glare in dual-energy tissue-bone imaging: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  C G Shaw; D B Plewes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography.

Authors:  L T Niklason; N M Hickey; D P Chakraborty; E A Sabbagh; M V Yester; R G Fraser; G T Barnes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging.

Authors:  T Ishigaki; S Sakuma; Y Horikawa; M Ikeda; H Yamaguchi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Dual-energy projection radiography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  W R Brody; D M Cassel; F G Sommer; L A Lehmann; A Macovski; R E Alvarez; N J Pelc; S J Riederer; A L Hall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography.

Authors:  W R Brody; G Butt; A Hall; A Macovski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.

Authors:  G T Barnes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.

Authors:  D S Breitenstein; C C Shaw
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ricarda Rühl; Magdalena M Wozniak; Michael Werk; François Laurent; Georg Mager; Michel Montaudon; Andreas Pattermann; Antoine Scherrer; Jean-Pierre Tasu; Maciej Pech; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.