Literature DB >> 9718504

Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.

D S Breitenstein1, C C Shaw.   

Abstract

Tissue composition measurement may provide a quantitatively and physically meaningful method to objectively determine the "mammographic density" linked to breast cancer risk. A single energy hybrid (SEH) techniques is described for measuring the tissue composition on a pixel-by-pixel basis with a single digital mammogram. Theoretical models were derived and used to compute signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in tissue composition measurement using the SEH method. The results were compared with those computed for measurements using the dual kVp and dual screen methods. SNRs were theoretically related to the pixel area, total unattenuated detector exposure and fluence spectra of the incident X-rays. SNRs were computed for measurement of the adipose tissue thickness for a 6 cm thick breast, consisting of 50% of adipose tissue and 50% of glandular tissue. Effects of kVp and prepatient filtration were studied by computing the SNRs for various kVps and filters and optimal kVps and filters are determined. The results showed that the SNRs obtained with the SEH method is an order of magnitude better than the dual kVp method, which, in turn, is an order of magnitude better than the dual screen method. When using the optimal kVp's and no prepatient filtration, the SNRs were computed to be 84.2, 13.2, and 2.0 for the SEH, dual kVp, and dual screen methods, respectively. Prepatient filtration can improve the SNR by as much as 35% for the dual kVp and dual screen techniques with reasonable tube loading factors (8-10).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718504      PMCID: PMC3453203          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  25 in total

1.  Model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.

Authors:  R M Nishikawa; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography.

Authors:  D S Brettle; A R Cowen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes.

Authors:  D R White; R J Martin; R Darlison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Incorporation of scattered radiation into dual-energy radiologic theory and application to mammography.

Authors:  P C Johns; R M Beauregard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dual-energy x-ray imaging technique for in vitro tissue composition measurement.

Authors:  M Moreau; D W Holdsworth; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.

Authors:  P C Johns; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography.

Authors:  L A Lehmann; R E Alvarez; A Macovski; W R Brody; N J Pelc; S J Riederer; A L Hall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J W Byng; R A Jong; E K Fishell; L E Little; A B Miller; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; L A Brinton; R Hoover; R Haile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Classification of breast microcalcifications using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Bahaa Ghammraoui; Andrey Makeev; Ahmed Zidan; Alaadin Alayoubi; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.