Literature DB >> 9291606

Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images.

M A Webster1, E Miyahara.   

Abstract

Natural images have a characteristic spatial structure, with amplitude spectra that decrease with frequency roughly as 1/f. We have examined how contrast (pattern-selective) adaptation to this structure influences the spatial sensitivity of the visual system. Contrast thresholds and suprathreshold contrast and frequency matches were measured after adaptation to random samples from an ensemble of images of outdoor scenes or of synthetic images formed by filtering the amplitude spectra of noise over a range of spectral slopes. Adaptation selectively reduced sensitivity at low-to-medium frequencies, biasing contrast sensitivity toward higher frequencies. The pattern of aftereffects was similar for different natural image ensembles but varied with large changes in the slope of the noise spectra. Our results suggest that adaptation to the spatial structure in natural scenes may exert strong and selective influences on perception that are important in characterizing the normal operating states of the visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9291606     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.002355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  23 in total

1.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces.

Authors:  M A Webster; O H MacLin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Macaque V1 representations in natural and reduced visual contexts: spatial and temporal properties and influence of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Octavio Ruiz; Michael A Paradiso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Contrast sensitivity, V1 neural activity, and natural vision.

Authors:  James E Niemeyer; Michael A Paradiso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Semantic control of feature extraction from natural scenes.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Contrast adaptation contributes to contrast-invariance of orientation tuning of primate V1 cells.

Authors:  Lionel G Nowak; Pascal Barone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.