Literature DB >> 9327051

Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision.

S J Galvin1, R P O'Shea, A M Squire, D G Govan.   

Abstract

Although much has been learned about the spatial sampling and filtering properties of peripheral vision, little attention has been paid to the remarkably clear appearance of the peripheral visual field. To study the apparent sharpness of stimuli presented in the periphery, we presented Gaussian blurred horizontal edges at 8.3, 16.6, 24, 32, and 40 deg eccentricity. Observers adjusted the sharpness of a similar edge, viewed foveally, to match the appearance of the peripheral stimulus. All observers matched blurred peripheral stimuli with sharper foveal stimuli. We have called this effect "sharpness overconstancy". For field sizes of 4 deg, there was greater overconstancy at larger eccentricities. Scaling the field size of the peripheral stimuli by a cortical magnification factor produced sharpness overconstancy which was independent of eccentricity. In both cases, there was a slight sharpness underconstancy for peripherally presented edges blurred only slightly. We consider various explanations of peripheral sharpness overconstancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9327051     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00016-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stephen T Hammett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Decoding natural signals from the peripheral retina.

Authors:  Brian C McCann; Mary M Hayhoe; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Characterization of field loss based on microperimetry is predictive of face recognition difficulties.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Christopher Patrick Taylor; Jennifer Wallis; Mary Lou Jackson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  What is visible across the visual field?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.