Literature DB >> 10496540

Forever young: visual functions not affected or minimally affected by aging: a review.

J M Enoch1, J S Werner, G Haegerstrom-Portnoy, V Lakshminarayanan, M Rynders.   

Abstract

Six visual functions, once developed to adult levels of performance, have been noted to exhibit little or no alteration with aging (also see Appendix, Note 1). Those selected for more substantial discussions in this article are: (a) the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE-I), also known as the "directional sensitivity of the retina"; (b) specific vernier acuity paradigms (including alignment of two lines one with the other, and two- and three-point vernier alignment tasks); and (c) color vision-related perceptual constancies. Each of these functions has rather different origins in the visual system. The SCE incorporates optical waveguide photoreceptor properties and has both physical and physiological origins; vernier acuity (one of the hyperacuities) is largely the result of neural data processing mechanisms; and the color vision-related effects have their origins in retinal neural processes. Descriptions of additional visual functions minimally affected by age are presented as well. This recent research raises many questions. How can these visual responses be so stable, when so many other visual responses show decrements with aging? What does it mean if anomalous responses within the more stable functions are encountered in individuals? Can these age-resistant functions be employed to help sustain other functions in aging individuals? Are such relatively invariant functions limited to the visual system? Because of the stability of the reported responses with aging, these same relationships can be used as test controls for other studies of aging, and as benchmarks to distinguish between "normal" aging and disease processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10496540     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/54.8.b336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  10 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Age-related changes in the visual pathways: blame it on the axon.

Authors:  David J Calkins
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Chromatic-Spatial Vision of the Aging Eye.

Authors:  John S Werner; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy
Journal:  Opt Rev       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 0.890

4.  Ageing and visual spatiotemporal processing.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Marina Kunchulia; Khatuna Parkosadze; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adjusting to a sudden “aging” of the lens.

Authors:  Katherine E M Tregillus; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Age-related changes in functional visual acuity in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Minako Kaido; Ikuko Toda; Reiko Ishida; Mototaka Konagai; Murat Dogru; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs.

Authors:  James A Davison; Anil S Patel; Joao P Cunha; Jim Schwiegerling; Orkun Muftuoglu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Distinct Aging Effects on Motion Repulsion and Surround Suppression in Humans.

Authors:  Hu Deng; Weiying Chen; Shenbing Kuang; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Pupillary responses to short-wavelength light are preserved in aging.

Authors:  A V Rukmini; Dan Milea; Tin Aung; Joshua J Gooley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.