Literature DB >> 23829037

Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.

Mark C Schall1, Michelle L Rusch, John D Lee, Jeffrey D Dawson, Geb Thomas, Nazan Aksan, Matthew Rizzo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) cues in improving driving safety among elderly drivers who are at increased crash risk because of cognitive impairments.
BACKGROUND: Cognitively challenging driving environments pose a particular crash risk for elderly drivers. AR cuing is a promising technology to mitigate risk by directing driver attention to roadway hazards. We investigate whether AR cues improve or interfere with hazard perception in elderly drivers with age-related cognitive decline.
METHOD: A total of 20 elderly (M = 73 years, SD = 5) licensed drivers with a range of cognitive abilities measured by a speed-of-processing (SOP) composite participated in a 1-hr drive in an interactive, fixed-base driving simulator. Each participant drove through six straight, 6-mile-long, rural roadway scenarios following a lead vehicle. AR cues directed attention to potential roadside hazards in three of the scenarios, and the other three were uncued (baseline) drives. Effects of AR cuing were evaluated with respect to (a) detection of hazardous target objects, (b) interference with detecting nonhazardous secondary objects, and (c) impairment in maintaining safe distance behind a lead vehicle.
RESULTS: AR cuing improved the detection of hazardous target objects of low visibility. AR cues did not interfere with detection of nonhazardous secondary objects and did not impair ability to maintain safe distance behind a lead vehicle. SOP capacity did not moderate those effects.
CONCLUSION: AR cues show promise for improving elderly driver safety by increasing hazard detection likelihood without interfering with other driving tasks, such as maintaining safe headway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23829037      PMCID: PMC3875361          DOI: 10.1177/0018720812462029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  34 in total

1.  Comparison between younger and older drivers of the effect of obstacle direction on the minimum obstacle distance to brake and avoid a motor vehicle accident.

Authors:  Pierre-Luc Martin; Thérèse Audet; Hélène Corriveau; Mathieu Hamel; Monia D'Amours; Cécile Smeesters
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2010-02-04

2.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2005-09

3.  Divided attention in experienced young and older drivers: lane tracking and visual analysis in a dynamic driving simulator.

Authors:  W H Brouwer; W Waterink; P C Van Wolffelaar; T Rothengatter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Nick Reed; Charles Spence
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 5.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task.

Authors:  R W Ponds; W H Brouwer; P C van Wolffelaar
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-11

7.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

8.  Predictors of driving safety in early Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  J D Dawson; S W Anderson; E Y Uc; E Dastrup; M Rizzo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems.

Authors:  M N Lees; J D Lee
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Why do older drivers give up driving?

Authors:  L Hakamies-Blomqvist; B Wahlström
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1998-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Augmented reality cues to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2014-06-18

2.  Time-to-contact estimation errors among older drivers with useful field of view impairments.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Samantha V Edwards; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-07-26

3.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

4.  AR DriveSim: An Immersive Driving Simulator for Augmented Reality Head-Up Display Research.

Authors:  Joseph L Gabbard; Missie Smith; Kyle Tanous; Hyungil Kim; Bryan Jonas
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-10-23

5.  A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Arindam Dey; Mark Billinghurst; Robert W Lindeman; J Edward Swan
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-04-17

6.  Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Anna Kosovicheva; Simon Stent; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.