J D Dawson1, S W Anderson, E Y Uc, E Dastrup, M Rizzo. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, 200 Hawkins Dr., C-22 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. jeffrey-dawson@uiowa.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the association of cognition, visual perception, and motor function with driving safety in Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Forty drivers with probable early AD (mean Mini-Mental State Examination score 26.5) and 115 elderly drivers without neurologic disease underwent a battery of cognitive, visual, and motor tests, and drove a standardized 35-mile route in urban and rural settings in an instrumented vehicle. A composite cognitive score (COGSTAT) was calculated for each subject based on eight neuropsychological tests. Driving safety errors were noted and classified by a driving expert based on video review. RESULTS: Drivers with AD committed an average of 42.0 safety errors/drive (SD = 12.8), compared to an average of 33.2 (SD = 12.2) for drivers without AD (p < 0.0001); the most common errors were lane violations. Increased age was predictive of errors, with a mean of 2.3 more errors per drive observed for each 5-year age increment. After adjustment for age and gender, COGSTAT was a significant predictor of safety errors in subjects with AD, with a 4.1 increase in safety errors observed for a 1 SD decrease in cognitive function. Significant increases in safety errors were also found in subjects with AD with poorer scores on Benton Visual Retention Test, Complex Figure Test-Copy, Trail Making Subtest-A, and the Functional Reach Test. CONCLUSION: Drivers with Alzheimer disease (AD) exhibit a range of performance on tests of cognition, vision, and motor skills. Since these tests provide additional predictive value of driving performance beyond diagnosis alone, clinicians may use these tests to help predict whether a patient with AD can safely operate a motor vehicle.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the association of cognition, visual perception, and motor function with driving safety in Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Forty drivers with probable early AD (mean Mini-Mental State Examination score 26.5) and 115 elderly drivers without neurologic disease underwent a battery of cognitive, visual, and motor tests, and drove a standardized 35-mile route in urban and rural settings in an instrumented vehicle. A composite cognitive score (COGSTAT) was calculated for each subject based on eight neuropsychological tests. Driving safety errors were noted and classified by a driving expert based on video review. RESULTS: Drivers with AD committed an average of 42.0 safety errors/drive (SD = 12.8), compared to an average of 33.2 (SD = 12.2) for drivers without AD (p < 0.0001); the most common errors were lane violations. Increased age was predictive of errors, with a mean of 2.3 more errors per drive observed for each 5-year age increment. After adjustment for age and gender, COGSTAT was a significant predictor of safety errors in subjects with AD, with a 4.1 increase in safety errors observed for a 1 SD decrease in cognitive function. Significant increases in safety errors were also found in subjects with AD with poorer scores on Benton Visual Retention Test, Complex Figure Test-Copy, Trail Making Subtest-A, and the Functional Reach Test. CONCLUSION: Drivers with Alzheimer disease (AD) exhibit a range of performance on tests of cognition, vision, and motor skills. Since these tests provide additional predictive value of driving performance beyond diagnosis alone, clinicians may use these tests to help predict whether a patient with AD can safely operate a motor vehicle.
Authors: Mark A Reger; Robert K Welsh; G Stennis Watson; Brenna Cholerton; Laura D Baker; Suzanne Craft Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Janet M Duchek; David B Carr; Linda Hunt; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; Kamini Shah; John C Morris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: B R Ott; W C Heindel; G D Papandonatos; E K Festa; J D Davis; L A Daiello; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christopher J Barry; Darin Smith; Peter Lennarson; Julie Jermeland; Warren Darling; Laura Stierman; Matthew Rizzo; Vincent C Traynelis Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Li Yang; Thomas B Morland; Kristen Schmits; Elizabeth Rawson; Poojitha Narasimhan; Joshua E Motelow; Michael J Purcaro; Kathy Peng; Saned Raouf; Matthew N Desalvo; Taemin Oh; Jerome Wilkerson; Jessica Bod; Aditya Srinivasan; Pimen Kurashvili; Joseph Anaya; Peter Manza; Nathan Danielson; Christopher B Ransom; Linda Huh; Susan Elrich; Jose Padin-Rosado; Yamini Naidu; Kamil Detyniecki; Hamada Hamid; Pue Farooque; Robert Astur; Bo Xiao; Robert B Duckrow; Hal Blumenfeld Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Becca R Levy; Alan B Zonderman; Martin D Slade; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Joseph Barrash; Ashley Stillman; Steven W Anderson; Ergun Y Uc; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Laura A Fraade-Blanar; Ryan N Hansen; Kwun Chuen G Chan; Jeanne M Sears; Hilaire J Thompson; Paul K Crane; Beth E Ebel Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2018-03-07