Literature DB >> 3183311

Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task.

R W Ponds1, W H Brouwer, P C van Wolffelaar.   

Abstract

The ability of young, middle-aged, and old adults to divide attention was examined using a dual task experiment involving two continuous performance tasks. The first task was a compensatory tracking task modeled after the important everyday activity of car driving. The second task was a self-paced visual choice-reaction time task requiring analysis of a small visual display presented in such a way that no eye movements were required when the two tasks had to be performed simultaneously. Single-task difficulty was individually adjusted for each subject. Performance-Operating-Characteristics were used to control for individual differences in attention allocation strategies. Even when individual differences in single task performance were adequately controlled for, elderly adults showed a significantly decreased ability to divide attention when compared with young and middle-aged adults. Young and middle-aged adults did not differ in the ability to divide attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3183311     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/43.6.p151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  14 in total

1.  Drawing clocks and driving cars.

Authors:  Barbara Freund; Stefan Gravenstein; Rebecca Ferris; Bonnie L Burke; Elias Shaheen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Aging of attention: does the ability to divide decline?

Authors:  T A Salthouse; N M Fristoe; T T Lineweaver; V E Coon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01

4.  Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Michelle L Rusch; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Geb Thomas; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Adults Aged 65 and Older Use Potentially Distracting Electronic Devices While Driving.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Vernon; Ganesh M Babulal; Denise Head; David Carr; Nupur Ghoshal; Peggy P Barco; John C Morris; Catherine M Roe
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Functional and neurobiological similarities of aging in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  M L Voytko
Journal:  Age (Omaha)       Date:  1997-01

7.  Using Direct and Indirect Input Devices: Attention Demands and Age-Related Differences.

Authors:  Anne Collins McLaughlin; Wendy A Rogers; Arthur D Fisk
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.351

8.  Leukoaraiosis significantly worsens driving performance of ordinary older drivers.

Authors:  Kimihiko Nakano; Kaechang Park; Rencheng Zheng; Fang Fang; Masanori Ohori; Hiroki Nakamura; Yasuhiho Kumagai; Hiroshi Okada; Kazuhiko Teramura; Satoshi Nakayama; Akinori Irimajiri; Hiroshi Taoka; Satoshi Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Strength-balance supplemented with computerized cognitive training to improve dual task gait and divided attention in older adults: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Eva van het Reve; Eling D de Bruin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Modelling the Relationship between the Nature of Work Factors and Driving Performance Mediating by Role of Fatigue.

Authors:  Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi; Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha; Nicholas Chileshe; Mohammed Abdulrab; Anwar Ameen Hezam Saeed; Ahmed Farouk Kineber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.