Literature DB >> 33500923

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014.

Arindam Dey1, Mark Billinghurst1, Robert W Lindeman2, J Edward Swan3.   

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies.
Copyright © 2018 Dey, Billinghurst, Lindeman and Swan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented reality; classifications; experimentation; systematic review; usability; user studies

Year:  2018        PMID: 33500923      PMCID: PMC7805955          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  46 in total

1.  Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation.

Authors:  Falko Kellner; Benjamin Bolte; Gerd Bruder; Ulrich Rautenberg; Frank Steinicke; Markus Lappe; Reinhard Koch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Image overlay guidance for needle insertion in CT scanner.

Authors:  Gabor Fichtinger; Anton Deguet; Ken Masamune; Emese Balogh; Gregory S Fischer; Herve Mathieu; Russell H Taylor; S James Zinreich; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Sonja N Buzink; Marlies P Schijven; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Intelligent tutoring systems.

Authors:  J R Anderson; C F Boyle; B J Reiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  View management of projected labels on nonplanar and textured surfaces.

Authors:  Daisuke Iwai; Tatsunori Yabiki; Kosuke Sato
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Innovative system for real-time ergonomic feedback in industrial manufacturing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vignais; Markus Miezal; Gabriele Bleser; Katharina Mura; Dominic Gorecky; Frédéric Marin
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Stereovision and augmented reality for closed-loop control of grasping in hand prostheses.

Authors:  Marko Markovic; Strahinja Dosen; Christian Cipriani; Dejan Popovic; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

9.  Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Selcuk Guven; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Mathias Baumhauer; Esref Oguz Güven; Faruk Yencilek; Ali Serdar Gözen; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Towards intelligent environments: an augmented reality-brain-machine interface operated with a see-through head-mount display.

Authors:  Kouji Takano; Naoki Hata; Kenji Kansaku
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  6 in total

1.  Performance and Usability Evaluation of an Extended Reality Platform to Monitor Patient's Health during Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Pasquale Arpaia; Egidio De Benedetto; Lucio De Paolis; Giovanni D'Errico; Nicola Donato; Luigi Duraccio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Saliency-Aware Subtle Augmentation Improves Human Visual Search Performance in VR.

Authors:  Olga Lukashova-Sanz; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-25

3.  Metasurface wavefront control for high-performance user-natural augmented reality waveguide glasses.

Authors:  Hyunpil Boo; Yoo Seung Lee; Hangbo Yang; Brian Matthews; Tom G Lee; Chee Wei Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Augmented Reality Games and Presence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anabela Marto; Alexandrino Gonçalves
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  Social Media Users' Perceptions of a Wearable Mixed Reality Headset During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.

Authors:  Heejin Jeong; Allison Bayro; Sai Patipati Umesh; Kaushal Mamgain; Moontae Lee
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.364

6.  Why and How to Approach User Experience in Safety-Critical Domains: The Example of Health Care.

Authors:  Tobias Grundgeiger; Jörn Hurtienne; Oliver Happel
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.888

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.