Literature DB >> 24950128

Augmented reality cues to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns.

Michelle L Rusch1, Mark C Schall2, John D Lee3, Jeffrey D Dawson4, Matthew Rizzo5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of augmented reality (AR) cues designed to assist middle-aged and older drivers with a range of UFOV impairments, judging when to make left-turns across oncoming traffic. Previous studies have shown that AR cues can help middle-aged and older drivers respond to potential roadside hazards by increasing hazard detection without interfering with other driving tasks. Intersections pose a critical challenge for cognitively impaired drivers, prone to misjudge time-to-contact with oncoming traffic. We investigated whether AR cues improve or interfere with hazard perception in left-turns across oncoming traffic for drivers with age-related cognitive decline. Sixty-four middle-aged and older drivers with a range of UFOV impairment judged when it would be safe to turn left across oncoming traffic approaching the driver from the opposite direction in a rural stop-sign controlled intersection scenario implemented in a static base driving simulator. Outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of AR cueing included: Time-to-Contact (TTC), Gap Time Variation (GTV), Response Rate, and Gap Response Variation (GRV). All drivers estimated TTCs were shorter in cued than in uncued conditions. In addition, drivers responded more often in cued conditions than in uncued conditions and GRV decreased for all drivers in scenarios that contained AR cues. For both TTC and response rate, drivers also appeared to adjust their behavior to be consistent with the cues, especially drivers with the poorest UFOV scores (matching their behavior to be close to middle-aged drivers). Driver ratings indicated that cueing was not considered to be distracting. Further, various conditions of reliability (e.g., 15% miss rate) did not appear to affect performance or driver ratings.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Augmented reality; Displays; Driver behavior; Left-turns; UFOV

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24950128      PMCID: PMC4104258          DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  26 in total

1.  Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers.

Authors:  G McGwin; D B Brown
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1999-05

2.  Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.

Authors:  John D Lee; Daniel V McGehee; Timothy L Brown; Michelle L Reyes
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Factors influencing the probability of an incident at a junction: results from an interactive driving simulator.

Authors:  Jennifer Alexander; Philip Barham; Ian Black
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2002-11

4.  Speed-of-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance.

Authors:  Daniel L Roenker; Gayla M Cissell; Karlene K Ball; Virginia G Wadley; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Driver acceptance of false alarms to simulated encroachment.

Authors:  Kip Smith; Jan-Erik Källhammer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  The hazard perception ability of older drivers.

Authors:  Mark S Horswill; Shelby A Marrington; Cynthia M McCullough; Joanne Wood; Nancy A Pachana; Jenna McWilliam; Maria K Raikos
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems.

Authors:  R Parasuraman; P A Hancock; O Olofinboba
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Michelle L Rusch; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Geb Thomas; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems.

Authors:  M N Lees; J D Lee
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Susceptibility to social pressure following ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage.

Authors:  Kuan-Hua Chen; Michelle L Rusch; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo; Steven W Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Time-to-contact estimation errors among older drivers with useful field of view impairments.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Samantha V Edwards; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-07-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.