| Literature DB >> 23826284 |
Ju-Sheng Zheng1, Donna K Arnett, Laurence D Parnell, Yu-Chi Lee, Yiyi Ma, Caren E Smith, Kris Richardson, Duo Li, Ingrid B Borecki, Katherine L Tucker, José M Ordovás, Chao-Qiang Lai.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neighboring genes PIK3CA and KCNMB3 are both important for insulin signaling and β-cell function, but their associations with glucose-related traits are unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826284 PMCID: PMC3694924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of participants in GOLDN and the BPRHS1.
| Characteristics | GOLDN | BPRHS | ||
| Men (n = 406) | Women (n = 414) | Men (n = 239) | Women (n = 605) | |
| Age, y | 48.8±15.9 | 49.0±16.1 | 57.6±7.7 | 58.1±7.1 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28.6±4.7 | 28.4±6.2 | 29.9±5.1 | 33.0±7.0 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 101±14 | 93.4±17.5 | 102±14 | 102±16 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 33 (8.1) | 34 (8.2) | 70 (29.9) | 112 (18.7) |
| Current drinker, n (%) | 199 (49) | 208 (50.2) | 121 (50.6) | 196 (32.4) |
| Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 33 (8.1) | 26 (6.3) | 106 (44.4) | 254 (42.0) |
| Energy intake, kJ/d | 10481±6282 | 7450±3419 | 12134±6353 | 9200±4874 |
| Total fat intake, % | 35.9±6.7 | 35.1±6.9 | 32.4±6.0 | 31.4±5.5 |
| Saturated fat intake, % | 12.1±2.7 | 11.6±2.6 | 9.8±2.7 | 9.4±2.3 |
| MUFA intake, % | 13.6±2.8 | 13.0±2.8 | 11.3±2.2 | 10.8±2.1 |
| PUFA intake, % | 7.4±2.0 | 8.0±2.3 | 8.8±2.1 | 8.6±2.1 |
| n-3 PUFA intake, % | 0.68±0.19 | 0.75±0.23 | 0.69±0.18 | 0.71±0.19 |
| n-6 PUFA intake, % | 6.64±1.83 | 7.14±2.16 | 8.07±1.99 | 7.91±2.00 |
| n-3: n-6 | 0.10±0.02 | 0.11±0.02 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.09±0.03 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.87±2.63 | 3.37±2.31 | 5.95±7.69 | 5.80±7.16 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 5.87±1.19 | 5.46±0.94 | 6.93±2.91 | 6.77±2.83 |
| Insulin, pmol/L | 101±58 | 94.5±56.5 | 124±117 | 125±113 |
| HbA1c, % | NA | NA | 7.09±1.96 | 7.11±1.78 |
Values are mean ± SD, or n (%).
P<0.01 different from men within the population; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; NA, not available.
Associations between PIK3CA-KCNMB3 variants and glucose-related traits in the GOLDN and BPRHS participants1.
| Genotypes (n) | GOLDN | BPRHS | Meta-analysis | |||||
| Mean ± SEM (n) |
| Mean ± SEM (n) |
| Z-score |
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||
| rs7645550 | CC+CT | 3.69±0.10 (698) | 0.004 | 5.93±0.28 (730) | 0.234 | 2.86 | 0.004 | 31.6 |
| TT | 3.18±0.19 (122) | 5.33±0.62 (113) | ||||||
| rs1183319 | AG+GG | 3.66±0.10 (571) | 0.060 | 5.97±0.29 (680) | 0.240 | 2.19 | 0.028 | 0 |
| AA | 3.50±0.16 (249) | 5.41±0.47 (159) | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| rs7645550 | CC+CT | 99.4±2.2 (698) | 0.048 | 126±4 (730) | 0.185 | 2.33 | 0.02 | 0 |
| TT | 88.5±4.5 (122) | 117±11 (113) | ||||||
| rs1183319 | AG+GG | 98.5±2.4 (571) | 0.319 | 127±5 (680) | 0.483 | 1.20 | 0.229 | 0 |
| AA | 96.0±3.7(249) | 118±8 (159) | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| rs7645550 | CC+CT | 5.70±0.04 (698) | 0.0001 | 6.80±0.11 (730) | 0.895 | 2.83 | 0.005 | 86.1 |
| TT | 5.46±0.09 (122) | 6.90±0.27 (113) | ||||||
| rs1183319 | AG+GG | 5.68±0.04 (571) | 0.008 | 6.84±0.11 (680) | 0.120 | 3.14 | 0.002 | 0 |
| AA | 5.62±0.08 (249) | 6.73±0.21 (159) | ||||||
Values are mean ± SEM. P-values were adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, alcohol drinking, smoking status, physical activity, type 2 diabetes, study center and family relationships in GOLDN; P-values were adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, alcohol drinking, smoking status, physical activity, type 2 diabetes and population admixture in BPRHS. Meta-analysis was used to combine Z statistics across GOLDN and the BPRHS, weighted by the sample size; I2 was used to assess statistical heterogeneity: I2 values of 25%, 50% and 75% correspond to cut-off points for low, moderate and high degrees of heterogeneity.
Interactions between dietary fatty acids and PIK3CA-KCNMB3 variants on HOMA-IR in the GOLDN participants1.
| Dietaryfatty acids | % energy | rs1183319 | rs7642066 | ||||||
| AG+GG (n) | AA (n) |
|
| AA+AT (n) | TT (n) |
|
| ||
| Total fat | ≤35.66 | 3.40±0.12 (289) | 3.60±0.22 (120) | 0.467 | 0.003 | 3.52±0.13 (287) | 3.32±0.16 (122) | 0.278 | 0.045 |
| >35.66 | 3.94±0.17 (281) | 3.41±0.22 (128) | <0.001 | 3.62±0.15 (282) | 4.13±0.30 (127) | 0.105 | |||
| Total MUFA | ≤13.23 | 3.49±0.15 (278) | 3.57±0.21 (131) | 0.601 | 0.009 | 3.52±0.14 (287) | 3.52±0.25 (122) | 0.097 | 0.002 |
| >13.23 | 3.83±0.15 (292) | 3.43±0.24 (117) | 0.002 | 3.62±0.15 (282) | 3.93±0.23 (127) | 0.013 | |||
| Total SFA | ≤11.82 | 3.58±0.14 (290) | 3.54±0.23 (119) | 0.957 | 0.024 | 3.52±0.14 (285) | 3.67±0.22 (124) | 0.951 | 0.855 |
| >11.82 | 3.76±0.16 (280) | 3.47±0.22 (129) | 0.003 | 3.62±0.14 (284) | 3.77±0.27 (125) | 0.785 | |||
| Total n-3 PUFA | ≤0.68 | 3.49±0.13 (289) | 3.37±0.19 (120) | 0.293 | 0.588 | 3.56±0.13 (286) | 3.21±0.17 (123) | 0.227 | 0.059 |
| >0.68 | 3.85±0.17 (281) | 3.62±0.25 (128) | 0.063 | 3.57±0.15 (283) | 4.24±0.29 (126) | 0.115 | |||
| Total n-6 PUFA | ≤6.60 | 3.55±0.12 (280) | 3.42±0.17 (129) | 0.498 | 0.197 | 3.61±0.12 (292) | 3.27±0.18 (117) | 0.129 | 0.008 |
| >6.60 | 3.78±0.17 (290) | 3.60±0.27 (119) | 0.015 | 3.53±0.16 (277) | 4.15±0.28 (132) | 0.018 | |||
| n-3: n-6 | ≤0.11 | 3.81±0.16 (299) | 3.05±0.17 (110) | <0.001 | 0.001 | 3.46±0.13 (272) | 3.90±0.27 (137) | 0.040 | 0.018 |
| >0.11 | 3.50±0.13 (271) | 3.86±0.25 (138) | 0.368 | 3.67±0.15 (297) | 3.51±0.19 (112) | 0.178 | |||
| Total PUFA | ≤7.34 | 3.57±0.13 (282) | 3.42±0.18 (127) | 0.466 | 0.240 | 3.63±0.12 (293) | 3.26±0.18 (293) | 0.119 | 0.008 |
| >7.34 | 3.76±0.17 (288) | 3.59±0.27 (121) | 0.022 | 3.50±0.16 (276) | 4.14±0.28 (133) | 0.018 | |||
Values are mean ± SEM.
P-values were derived from a multivariate interaction model, after adjustment for age, sex, waist circumference, alcohol drinking, smoking status, physical activity, type 2 diabetes, study center and family relationships.
Figure 1Interactions between rs7645550 and dietary n-3: n-6 PUFA ratio on HOMA-IR and insulin in GOLDN.
When dietary n-3: n-6 PUFA ratio was low (≤0.11), there were significant differences by genotypes for HOMA-IR (P = 0.001) and insulin (P = 0.003), while no significant differences for HOMA-IR (P = 0.86) and insulin (P = 0.56) were observed among the rs7645550 genotypes when dietary n-3: n-6 PUFA ratio was high (>0.11). The number inside the bar indicates the number of participants with a given genotype.