BACKGROUND: Gene variants within regulatory regions are thought to be major contributors of the variation of complex traits/diseases. Genome wide association studies (GWAS), have identified scores of genetic variants that appear to contribute to human disease risk. However, most of these variants do not appear to be functional. Thus, the significance of the association may be brought up by still unknown mechanisms or by linkage disequilibrium (LD) with functional polymorphisms. In the present study, focused on functional variants related with the binding of microRNAs (miR), we utilized SNP data, including newly released 1000 Genomes Project data to perform a genome-wide scan of SNPs that abrogate or create miR recognition element (MRE) seed sites (MRESS). RESULTS: We identified 2723 SNPs disrupting, and 22295 SNPs creating MRESSs. We estimated the percent of SNPs falling within both validated (5%) and predicted conserved MRESSs (3%). We determined 87 of these MRESS SNPs were listed in GWAS association studies, or in strong LD with a GWAS SNP, and may represent the functional variants of identified GWAS SNPs. Furthermore, 39 of these have evidence of co-expression of target mRNA and the predicted miR. We also gathered previously published eQTL data supporting a functional role for four of these SNPs shown to associate with disease phenotypes. Comparison of FST statistics (a measure of population subdivision) for predicted MRESS SNPs against non MRESS SNPs revealed a significantly higher (P = 0.0004) degree of subdivision among MRESS SNPs, suggesting a role for these SNPs in environmentally driven selection. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the potential of publicly available resources to identify high priority candidate SNPs for functional studies and for disease risk prediction.
BACKGROUND: Gene variants within regulatory regions are thought to be major contributors of the variation of complex traits/diseases. Genome wide association studies (GWAS), have identified scores of genetic variants that appear to contribute to human disease risk. However, most of these variants do not appear to be functional. Thus, the significance of the association may be brought up by still unknown mechanisms or by linkage disequilibrium (LD) with functional polymorphisms. In the present study, focused on functional variants related with the binding of microRNAs (miR), we utilized SNP data, including newly released 1000 Genomes Project data to perform a genome-wide scan of SNPs that abrogate or create miR recognition element (MRE) seed sites (MRESS). RESULTS: We identified 2723 SNPs disrupting, and 22295 SNPs creating MRESSs. We estimated the percent of SNPs falling within both validated (5%) and predicted conserved MRESSs (3%). We determined 87 of these MRESS SNPs were listed in GWAS association studies, or in strong LD with a GWAS SNP, and may represent the functional variants of identified GWAS SNPs. Furthermore, 39 of these have evidence of co-expression of target mRNA and the predicted miR. We also gathered previously published eQTL data supporting a functional role for four of these SNPs shown to associate with disease phenotypes. Comparison of FST statistics (a measure of population subdivision) for predicted MRESS SNPs against non MRESS SNPs revealed a significantly higher (P = 0.0004) degree of subdivision among MRESS SNPs, suggesting a role for these SNPs in environmentally driven selection. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the potential of publicly available resources to identify high priority candidate SNPs for functional studies and for disease risk prediction.
Authors: Anna L Dixon; Liming Liang; Miriam F Moffatt; Wei Chen; Simon Heath; Kenny C C Wong; Jenny Taylor; Edward Burnett; Ivo Gut; Martin Farrall; G Mark Lathrop; Gonçalo R Abecasis; William O C Cookson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-09-16 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kasey C Vickers; Brian T Palmisano; Bassem M Shoucri; Robert D Shamburek; Alan T Remaley Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2011-03-20 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Kris Richardson; Qiong Louie-Gao; Donna K Arnett; Laurence D Parnell; Chao-Qiang Lai; Alberto Davalos; Caroline S Fox; Serkalem Demissie; L Adrienne Cupples; Carlos Fernandez-Hernando; Jose M Ordovas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jan Machal; Jan Novak; Renata Hezova; Filip Zlamal; Anna Vasku; Ondrej Slaby; Julie Bienertova-Vasku Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: Donato A Rivas; Sarah J Lessard; Nicholas P Rice; Michael S Lustgarten; Kawai So; Laurie J Goodyear; Laurence D Parnell; Roger A Fielding Journal: FASEB J Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kevin P Jensen; Henry R Kranzler; Murray B Stein; Joel Gelernter Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Kris Richardson; Jennifer A Nettleton; Noemi Rotllan; Toshiko Tanaka; Caren E Smith; Chao-Qiang Lai; Laurence D Parnell; Yu-Chi Lee; Jari Lahti; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Ani Manichaikul; Margaux Keller; Vera Mikkilä; Julius Ngwa; Frank J A van Rooij; Christie M Ballentyne; Ingrid B Borecki; L Adrienne Cupples; Melissa Garcia; Albert Hofman; Luigi Ferrucci; Dariush Mozaffarian; Mia-Maria Perälä; Olli Raitakari; Russell P Tracy; Donna K Arnett; Stefania Bandinelli; Eric Boerwinkle; Johan G Eriksson; Oscar H Franco; Mika Kähönen; Michael Nalls; David S Siscovick; Denise K Houston; Bruce M Psaty; Jorma Viikari; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Mark O Goodarzi; Terho Lehtimäki; Yongmei Liu; M Carola Zillikens; Yii-Der I Chen; André G Uitterlinden; Jerome I Rotter; Carlos Fernandez-Hernando; Jose M Ordovas Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 11.025