Literature DB >> 23807729

Long-term subjective outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Naoki Nakano1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Kazunari Ishida, Nobuhiro Tsumura, Ryosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Kurosaka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the results of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after ten years using patient-derived scores.
METHODS: Thirty posterior-stabilised total knee prostheses implanted using a computed tomography-free navigation system were compared with 30 matched total knee prostheses of the same type implanted using a conventional, manual technique. At an average of ten years after surgery, we investigated patient-reported outcomes using the Knee Society's new scoring system. The results of 27 patients (14 patients in the navigation group and 13 patients in the manual group) were assessed in this study.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the navigation and manual groups for any section of the questionnaire, which consisted of symptoms, patient satisfaction, patient expectation, walking/standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities.
CONCLUSION: After long-term follow-up, we found no subjective advantages of using a navigation system for patients who undergo TKA though the absolute number of patients was very small. Additional extensive studies are required to validate our result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807729      PMCID: PMC3779564          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1978-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Peter Loan; Vineet Sarin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Masahiro Kurosaka; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Ryosuke Kuroda; Katsuhiko Ishimoto; Kazuo Tsujimoto; Ryoichi Shiba; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Clinical values in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Masahiro Kurosaka; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Shinichi Yoshiya; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Ulrich Clemens; Steffen Kohler; Hartmuth Kiefer; Werner Konermann; Rolf K Miehlke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

7.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments.

Authors:  P H Bullens; C J van Loon; M C de Waal Malefijt; R F Laan; R P Veth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Molfetta; Davide Caldo
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.

Authors:  J M Spencer; S K Chauhan; K Sloan; A Taylor; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up.

Authors:  Michele d'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Paolo Barbadoro; Andrea Illuminati; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alessio Biazzo; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Kyu-Jin Cho; Jong-Keun Seon; Won-Young Jang; Chun-Gon Park; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Jochen Wolfsteiner; Franziska Otto; Florian Zeman; Tobias Renkawitz; Hans-Robert Springorum; Günther Maderbacher; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties using PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting implants in the same patients.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Tetsuya Sakurai; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Treatment satisfaction with pharmaceutical interventions in Japanese adults with osteoarthritis and chronic knee pain: an analysis of a web-based survey.

Authors:  Kaname Ueda; Nao Sasaki; Amir Goren; Shawna R Calhoun; Katsuhiro Shinjo; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: The outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Robert Wen-Wei Hsu; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Wun-Jer Shen; Wei-Bin Hsu; Shr-Hsin Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  A Systematic Literature Review of Three Modalities in Technologically Assisted TKA.

Authors:  William A Leone; Leah C Elson; Christopher R Anderson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.