Literature DB >> 15316675

Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Tomoyuki Matsumoto1, Nobuhiro Tsumura, Masahiro Kurosaka, Hirotsugu Muratsu, Ryosuke Kuroda, Katsuhiko Ishimoto, Kazuo Tsujimoto, Ryoichi Shiba, Shinichi Yoshiya.   

Abstract

We implanted 60 posterior stabilized total knee prostheses (P.F.C. Sigma, DePuy, Warsaw, USA). In 30 cases, we used a CT-free navigation system (Vector Vision, Brain LAB, Heimstetten, Germany), and in 30 matched-paired controls, we used a conventional manual implantation. We compared postoperative long-leg radiographs in the two groups. The results revealed a significant difference in favor of navigation. In addition, we compared the preoperative anteroposterior dimension of the femoral condyle with the postoperative value. While there were no significant differences in the preoperative anteroposterior dimension of the femoral condyle between the two groups, the postoperative value in the navigation group was significantly larger than that of the preoperative value. Therefore, surgeons using navigation systems should guard against the possibility of oversizing when determining the size of the femoral component.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316675      PMCID: PMC3456974          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0562-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation].

Authors:  J Y Jenny; C Boeri
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-11

2.  Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Peter Loan; Vineet Sarin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Stindel; J L Briard; P Merloz; S Plaweski; F Dubrana; C Lefevre; J Troccaz
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2002

5.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

Review 6.  Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Nizard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation.

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; A Chaker; P Bucek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Computer assisted knee replacement.

Authors:  S L Delp; S D Stulberg; B Davies; F Picard; F Leitner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E D Tillett; G A Engh; T Petersen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  D Saragaglia; F Picard; C Chaussard; E Montbarbon; F Leitner; P Cinquin
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-02-01
View more
  20 in total

1.  Soft tissue balance using the tibia first gap technique with navigation system in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Kazunari Ishida; Hirosi Sasaki; Shinya Oka; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  H Windhagen; F Thorey; S Ostermeier; J Emmerich; C J Wirth; C Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].

Authors:  C Lüring; M Tingart; J Beckmann; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Influence of intra-operative joint gap on post-operative flexion angle in osteoarthritis patients undergoing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Kiyonori Mizuno; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Naomasa Fukase; Seiji Kubo; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; J L Zuo; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Navigation knee replacement.

Authors:  Rupen Dattani; Surendra Patnaik; Avadhoot Kantak; Georgis Tselentakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Sang Jin Park; Keun Bae Lee; Gang Li; Michal Kozanek; Eun Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Seiji Kubo; Atsushi Kitagawa; Takaaki Chin; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Variations in ankle registration using two different anatomic landmarks: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Mustafa Citak; Charles Claps; Andrew D Pearle; Christopher Plaskos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.