Literature DB >> 17899009

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Markus Tingart1, Christian Lüring, Holger Bäthis, Johannes Beckmann, Joachim Grifka, Lars Perlick.   

Abstract

Restoration of the mechanical leg axis and component positioning are crucial factors affecting long-term results in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a prospective study, 1,000 patients were operated on either using a CT-free navigation system or the conventional jig-based technique. Leg alignment and component orientation were determined on postoperative X-rays. The mechanical leg axis was significantly better in the computer-assisted group (95%, within +/-3 degrees varus/valgus) compared to the conventional group (74%, within +/-3 degrees varus/valgus) (P < 0.001). On average, the operating time was increased by 8 min in the computer-assisted group. No significant differences were seen between senior and younger surgeons regarding postoperative leg alignment and operating time. Computer-assisted TKA leads to a more accurate restoration of leg alignment and component orientation compared to the conventional jig-based technique. Potential benefits in long-term outcome and functional improvement require further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899009     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0399-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Novotny; M H Gonzalez; F M Amirouche; Y C Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique].

Authors:  R K Mielke; U Clemens; J H Jens; S Kershally
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Plaskos; Antony J Hodgson; Kevin Inkpen; Robert W McGraw
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods.

Authors:  Kevin C Anderson; Knute C Buehler; David C Markel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements.

Authors:  R W Hood; M Vanni; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Short radiographs or long radiographs?

Authors:  D V Patel; B D Ferris; P M Aichroth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  47 in total

1.  Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Iorio; G Bolle; F Conteduca; L Valeo; J Conteduca; D Mazza; A Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  No difference between tibia-first and femur-first techniques in TKA using computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Markus Malzdorf; Christian Stärke; Pirtkien Randolf; Christoph Lohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; G Sabbioni; R Ben Ayad; M Filanti; N Rani; N Del Piccolo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae Han Ko; Chang Dong Han; Kyoo Ho Shin; Levis Nguku; Ick Hwan Yang; Woo Suk Lee; Kwang Il Kim; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedro Hinarejos; Mónica Corrales; Antonia Matamalas; Elvira Bisbe; Enric Cáceres
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA.

Authors:  Byung June Chung; Yeon Gwi Kang; Chong Bum Chang; Sung Ju Kim; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction.

Authors:  C Lüring; F Oczipka; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mui-Hong Lim; Andras Tallay; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Less outliers in pinless navigation compared with conventional surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Pak Lin Chin; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.