Literature DB >> 28550426

Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis.

Clemens Baier1, Jochen Wolfsteiner2, Franziska Otto2, Florian Zeman3, Tobias Renkawitz2, Hans-Robert Springorum2, Günther Maderbacher2, Joachim Grifka2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare the long-term outcome between navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which is currently not known.
METHODS: Long-term survivorship, clinical scores and radiographic results of a matched-pair group of 350 patients (350 knees) treated with navigated (n = 157) or conventional (n = 188) TKA for osteoarthritis over a period of 11 years were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The mean clinical follow-up was ten years. There were no clinically relevant differences with respect to any clinical outcome, patient satisfaction or pain between the two groups. Coronal leg alignment was closer (1.7-3.1°) to the neutral mechanical axis in the navigated group compared with the conventional group (2.6-4.7°). A total of 12 knees (6.4%) in the conventional group and three (1.9%) in the navigated group underwent revision surgery (p = 0.04), resulting in an absolute risk reduction of 4.5% for revision surgery by using navigation. Using any revision as an end point, the ten-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.1% in the navigated and 92.5% in the conventional group.
CONCLUSIONS: Navigated TKA improves implant survivorship compared with conventional TKA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term results; Navigated total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550426     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3509-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter; John B Meding; Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Ryan Redelman; Gregory W Faris; Kenneth E Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The patellar shift index: a reliable and valid measure for patellofemoral congruence following total knee arthroplasty with unresurfaced patella.

Authors:  Vahur Metsna; Pirja Sarap; Sigrid Vorobjov; Kaspar Tootsi; Aare Märtson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Moreland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: navigation reduced by the maximum?

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Armin Keshmiri; Magdalena Barthel; Hans-Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Campbell; J Stevens; L Pilch; C Stewart; Z Mahmood
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; Paul M Lichstein; Chao Shen; Anthony T Tokarski; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; M P Figgie; A E Inglis; M Kelly; M Sobel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; W F Flynn; S Saddler; K K Hansraj; M J Maynard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Clinical Outcomes After Computer-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chunming Xie; Kai Liu; Luxin Xiao; Rong Tang
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  12 in total

1.  Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marko Pećina; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up.

Authors:  Michele d'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Paolo Barbadoro; Andrea Illuminati; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Robotics-mechanical bridge between imaging and patient].

Authors:  M Ettinger; P Savov; T Calliess; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty with image-based and image-independent robotic support].

Authors:  M Ettinger; L-R Tücking; P Savov
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Research progress of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Jincheng Zhang; Shuo Feng; Leshu Zhang; Hang Zhou; Xiangyang Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 6.  Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Andrew G Kim; Zachary Bernhard; Alexander J Acuña; Victoria S Wu; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Quality of life after staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a minimum five-year follow-up study of seventy-eight patients.

Authors:  Takehiko Sugita; Naohisa Miyatake; Toshimi Aizawa; Akira Sasaki; Masayuki Kamimura; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Patient satisfaction - A comparison between patient-specific implants and conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pia Reimann; Martin Brucker; Dariusch Arbab; Christian Lüring
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

Review 9.  Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance : Video article.

Authors:  Tilman Calliess; Max Ettinger; Peter Savov; Roman Karkosch; Henning Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörg Arnholdt; Yama Kamawal; Konstantin Horas; Boris M Holzapfel; Fabian Gilbert; Axel Ripp; Maximilian Rudert; Andre F Steinert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.