OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sub-milliSievert (mSv) coronary CT angiography (cCTA) using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT acquisition combined with iterative image reconstruction. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (52.9 ± 8.7 years; 30 men) underwent dual-source cCTA using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. The tube current-time product was set to 50 % of standard-of-care CT examinations. Images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Image quality was scored and diagnostic performance for detection of ≥50 % stenosis was determined with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. RESULTS: CT was successfully performed in all 40 patients. Of the 601 assessable coronary segments, 543 (90.3 %) had diagnostic image quality. Per-patient sensitivity for detection of ≥50 % stenosis was 95.7 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 76.0-99.8 %] and specificity was 94.1 % (95 % CI, 69.2-99.7 %). Per-vessel sensitivity was 89.5 % (95 % CI, 77.8-95.6 %) with 93.2 % specificity (95 % CI, 86.0-97.0 %). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve on per-patient and per-vessel levels was 0.949 and 0.913. Mean effective dose was 0.58 ± 0.17 mSv. Mean size-specific dose estimate was 3.14 ± 1.15 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: High-pitch prospectively ECG-triggered cCTA combined with iterative image reconstruction provides high diagnostic accuracy with a radiation dose below 1 mSv for detection of coronary artery stenosis. KEY POINTS: • Cardiac CT with sub-milliSievert radiation dose is feasible in many patients • High-pitch spiral CT acquisition with iterative reconstruction detects coronary stenosis accurately. • Iterative reconstruction increases who can benefit from low-radiation cardiac CT.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sub-milliSievert (mSv) coronary CT angiography (cCTA) using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT acquisition combined with iterative image reconstruction. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (52.9 ± 8.7 years; 30 men) underwent dual-source cCTA using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. The tube current-time product was set to 50 % of standard-of-care CT examinations. Images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Image quality was scored and diagnostic performance for detection of ≥50 % stenosis was determined with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. RESULTS: CT was successfully performed in all 40 patients. Of the 601 assessable coronary segments, 543 (90.3 %) had diagnostic image quality. Per-patient sensitivity for detection of ≥50 % stenosis was 95.7 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 76.0-99.8 %] and specificity was 94.1 % (95 % CI, 69.2-99.7 %). Per-vessel sensitivity was 89.5 % (95 % CI, 77.8-95.6 %) with 93.2 % specificity (95 % CI, 86.0-97.0 %). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve on per-patient and per-vessel levels was 0.949 and 0.913. Mean effective dose was 0.58 ± 0.17 mSv. Mean size-specific dose estimate was 3.14 ± 1.15 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: High-pitch prospectively ECG-triggered cCTA combined with iterative image reconstruction provides high diagnostic accuracy with a radiation dose below 1 mSv for detection of coronary artery stenosis. KEY POINTS: • Cardiac CT with sub-milliSievert radiation dose is feasible in many patients • High-pitch spiral CT acquisition with iterative reconstruction detects coronary stenosis accurately. • Iterative reconstruction increases who can benefit from low-radiation cardiac CT.
Authors: Ullrich Ebersberger; Francesco Tricarico; U Joseph Schoepf; Philipp Blanke; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; William T Halligan; Thomas Henzler; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; Paul Apfaltrer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel Berman; Alan Brown; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ricardo C Cury; Milind Y Desai; Andrew J Einstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Robert Harrington; Udo Hoffmann; Rahul Khare; John Lesser; Christopher McGann; Alan Rosenberg; Robert Schwartz; Marc Shelton; Gerald W Smetana; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Tobias Goroll; Martin Seltmann; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Michael Uder; Michael Lell; Mohamed Marwan Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-04
Authors: Matthias Renker; Ashok Ramachandra; U Joseph Schoepf; Rainer Raupach; Paul Apfaltrer; Garrett W Rowe; Sebastian Vogt; Thomas G Flohr; J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Christian Fink; Thomas Henzler Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2011-05-25
Authors: Francesco Tricarico; Anthony M Hlavacek; U Joseph Schoepf; Ullrich Ebersberger; John W Nance; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Young Jun Cho; J Reid Spears; Francesco Secchi; Giancarlo Savino; Riccardo Marano; Stefan O Schoenberg; Lorenzo Bonomo; Paul Apfaltrer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Gilbert Puippe; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Robert Goetti; Thomas Pfammatter; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthias Renker; John W Nance; U Joseph Schoepf; Terrence X O'Brien; Peter L Zwerner; Mathias Meyer; J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Christian Fink; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Aleksander Kosmala; Bernhard Petritsch; Andreas Max Weng; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Tobias Gassenmaier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Julian L Wichmann; Xiaohan Hu; Alexander Engler; J Matthias Kerl; Martin Beeres; Claudia Frellesen; Wolfgang Luboldt; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Sonja Gordic; Lotus Desbiolles; Martin Sedlmair; Robert Manka; André Plass; Bernhard Schmidt; Daniela B Husarik; Francesco Maisano; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Long Jiang Zhang; Li Qi; Jing Wang; Chun Xiang Tang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xue Man Ji; James V Spearman; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: D Beitzke; V Berger-Kulemann; V Schöpf; S Unterhumer; E Spitzer; G M Feuchtner; M Gyöngyösi; K Uyanik-Uenal; A Zuckermann; C Loewe; F Wolf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 5.315