Aleksander Kosmala1, Bernhard Petritsch1, Andreas Max Weng1, Thorsten Alexander Bley1, Tobias Gassenmaier2. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Gassenmaie_T@ukw.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess radiation dose and image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) with a third-generation dual-source scanner in a real-world patient population. METHODS: Scans of otherwise unselected, consecutive patients referred for clinically indicated cCTA between June 2015 and November 2017 were included for retrospective analysis. Scan protocol was based on heart rate: prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch spiral below 60 beats per minute (bpm), prospectively ECG-gated sequential scan between 61 and 70 bpm, and retrospective spiral above 70 bmp or at irregular heart rates. Objective image quality was measured as signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); subjective image quality was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale by two independent readers. For radiation dose analysis, effective dose, size-specific dose estimates, and volume CT dose index were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients (median age, 60 years; 155 men) with a median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m2 (range, 16.7-60.9 kg/m2; 180 (64.7%) overweight or obese) were included (122 in the high-pitch spiral group, 60 in the prospective sequence group, and 96 in the retrospective spiral group). Median effective dose was 0.63 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 0.51-0.90 mSv) for high-pitch spiral, 1.32 mSv (IQR, 0.79-2.46 mSv) for prospective sequence, and 4.77 (IQR, 3.02-8.27 mSv) for retrospective spiral (p < 0.001). Most studies had at least very good image quality (91.4/88.8% R1/R2), with highest SNR and CNR in the high-pitch spiral group. CONCLUSIONS: cCTA with sufficient image quality is achievable at reasonably low radiation exposure in a real-world patient collective with a high proportion of overweight or obese patients. KEY POINTS: • Submillisievert radiation dose coronary CT angiography with good diagnostic image quality is feasible in the majority of cases in a real-world patient using high-pitch spiral. • Prospective sequence results in about double median effective dose compared to the high-pitch protocol. • To optimize individual radiation exposure, lowering the heart rate is paramount, as it allows for choosing a dose-optimized (high-pitch spiral) scan protocol.
OBJECTIVES: To assess radiation dose and image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) with a third-generation dual-source scanner in a real-world patient population. METHODS: Scans of otherwise unselected, consecutive patients referred for clinically indicated cCTA between June 2015 and November 2017 were included for retrospective analysis. Scan protocol was based on heart rate: prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch spiral below 60 beats per minute (bpm), prospectively ECG-gated sequential scan between 61 and 70 bpm, and retrospective spiral above 70 bmp or at irregular heart rates. Objective image quality was measured as signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); subjective image quality was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale by two independent readers. For radiation dose analysis, effective dose, size-specific dose estimates, and volume CT dose index were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients (median age, 60 years; 155 men) with a median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m2 (range, 16.7-60.9 kg/m2; 180 (64.7%) overweight or obese) were included (122 in the high-pitch spiral group, 60 in the prospective sequence group, and 96 in the retrospective spiral group). Median effective dose was 0.63 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 0.51-0.90 mSv) for high-pitch spiral, 1.32 mSv (IQR, 0.79-2.46 mSv) for prospective sequence, and 4.77 (IQR, 3.02-8.27 mSv) for retrospective spiral (p < 0.001). Most studies had at least very good image quality (91.4/88.8% R1/R2), with highest SNR and CNR in the high-pitch spiral group. CONCLUSIONS:cCTA with sufficient image quality is achievable at reasonably low radiation exposure in a real-world patient collective with a high proportion of overweight or obesepatients. KEY POINTS: • Submillisievert radiation dose coronary CT angiography with good diagnostic image quality is feasible in the majority of cases in a real-world patient using high-pitch spiral. • Prospective sequence results in about double median effective dose compared to the high-pitch protocol. • To optimize individual radiation exposure, lowering the heart rate is paramount, as it allows for choosing a dose-optimized (high-pitch spiral) scan protocol.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body mass index; Computed tomography angiography; Coronary artery disease; Heart rate; Radiation dosage
Authors: Gudrun M Feuchtner; Daniel Jodocy; Andrea Klauser; Bernhard Haberfellner; Iman Aglan; Alexander Spoeck; Stefan Hiehs; Peter Soegner; Werner Jaschke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-08-09 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Lars Husmann; Tiziano Schepis; Hans Scheffel; Oliver Gaemperli; Sebastian Leschka; Ines Valenta; Pascal Koepfli; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Stephan Baumueller; Robert Goetti; Thomas Schertler; Hans Scheffel; Andre Plass; Volkmar Falk; Gudrun Feuchtner; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Helmut Prosch; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Karl Peter Bohn; Ian Alberts; Clemens Mingels; Majda Thurnher; Paul Cumming; Kuangyu Shi; Alan Peters; Silvana Geleff; Xiaoli Lan; Feng Wang; Adrian Huber; Christoph Gräni; Johannes T Heverhagen; Axel Rominger; Matthias Fontanellaz; Heiko Schöder; Andreas Christe; Stavroula Mougiakakou; Lukas Ebner Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Manuel Hein; Philipp Breitbart; Jan Minners; Philipp Blanke; Simon Schoechlin; Christopher Schlett; Tobias Krauss; Martin Soschynski; Franz-Josef Neumann; Philipp Ruile Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Laura Duerden; Helen O'Brien; Susan Doshi; Pia Charters; Laurence King; Benjamin J Hudson; Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues Journal: BJR Open Date: 2022-09-09
Authors: Rami M Abazid; Yasmine T Sallam; Jonathan G Romsa; James C Warrington; Cigdem Akincioglu; Sabe De; Nikolaos Tzemos; William C Vezina Journal: Eur J Hybrid Imaging Date: 2022-02-01
Authors: Sebastian Gassenmaier; Ilias Tsiflikas; Simon Greulich; Jens Kuebler; Florian Hagen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Andreas M Niess; Christof Burgstahler; Patrick Krumm Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.315