Literature DB >> 25361619

Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures.

Philipp Doebler1, Heinz Holling2.   

Abstract

Many screening tests dichotomize a measurement to classify subjects. Typically a cut-off value is chosen in a way that allows identification of an acceptable number of cases relative to a reference procedure, but does not produce too many false positives at the same time. Thus for the same sample many pairs of sensitivities and false positive rates result as the cut-off is varied. The curve of these points is called the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. One goal of diagnostic meta-analysis is to integrate ROC curves and arrive at a summary ROC (SROC) curve. Holling, Böhning, and Böhning (Psychometrika 77:106-126, 2012a) demonstrated that finite semiparametric mixtures can describe the heterogeneity in a sample of Lehmann ROC curves well; this approach leads to clusters of SROC curves of a particular shape. We extend this work with the help of the [Formula: see text] transformation, a flexible family of transformations for proportions. A collection of SROC curves is constructed that approximately contains the Lehmann family but in addition allows the modeling of shapes beyond the Lehmann ROC curves. We introduce two rationales for determining the shape from the data. Using the fact that each curve corresponds to a natural univariate measure of diagnostic accuracy, we show how covariate adjusted mixtures lead to a meta-regression on SROC curves. Three worked examples illustrate the method.

Keywords:  diagnostic meta-analysis; meta-regression; semiparametric mixtures; summary receiver operating characteristic curve; transformations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361619     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-014-9430-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  30 in total

1.  A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models.

Authors:  M Aitkin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.

Authors:  Michael J Sweeting; Alexander J Sutton; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve.

Authors:  Chap T Le
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  L R Arends; T H Hamza; J C van Houwelingen; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; T Stijnen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

7.  Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the general population: psychometric performance of three questionnaires.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Rumpf; Ulfert Hapke; Christian Meyer; Ulrich John
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method.

Authors:  B Littenberg; L E Moses
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

Authors:  L E Moses; D Shapiro; B Littenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14
View more
  8 in total

1.  Higher-order clinical risk factor interaction analysis for overall mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Cheng-Hong Yang; Sin-Hua Moi; Li-Yeh Chuang; Jin-Bor Chen
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Emir Sehovic; Sara Urru; Giovanna Chiorino; Philipp Doebler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Chemical shift imaging for evaluation of adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Platzek; Dominik Sieron; Verena Plodeck; Angelika Borkowetz; Michael Laniado; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Distinguishing variation in referral accuracy from referral threshold: analysis of a national dataset of referrals for suspected cancer.

Authors:  Christopher D Burton; David J McLernon; Amanda J Lee; Peter Murchie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Structured data vs. unstructured data in machine learning prediction models for suicidal behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Hopkins; Debra J Rickwood; David J Hallford; Clare Watsford
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 6.  Predicting treatment response using EEG in major depressive disorder: A machine-learning meta-analysis.

Authors:  Devon Watts; Rafaela Fernandes Pulice; Jim Reilly; Andre R Brunoni; Flávio Kapczinski; Ives Cavalcante Passos
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 7.989

7.  An Umbrella Review With Meta-Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of COVID-19: Considerations for Trauma Patient Management.

Authors:  Andrés Gempeler; Dylan P Griswold; Gail Rosseau; Walter D Johnson; Neema Kaseje; Angelos Kolias; Peter J Hutchinson; Andres M Rubiano
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-26

8.  Estimation of Effect Heterogeneity in Rare Events Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Heinz Holling; Katrin Jansen; Walailuck Böhning; Dankmar Böhning; Susan Martin; Patarawan Sangnawakij
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.290

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.