Literature DB >> 10513757

Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.

S D Walter1, L Irwig, P P Glasziou.   

Abstract

We present a method to estimate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for combining information on a diagnostic test from several different studies. Unlike previous methods that assume the reference standard to be error free, our approach allows for the possibility of errors in the reference standard, through use of a latent class model. The model provides estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test and the case prevalence in each study; these parameters can then be used in a meta-analysis, for example, using the regression method proposed by Moses et al., of a measure of test discrimination on a measure of the diagnostic threshold, to fit the SROC. The method is illustrated with an example on Pap smears that shows how adjusting for imperfection in the reference standard typically reduces the scatter of data in the SROC plot, and tends to indicate better performance of the test than otherwise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10513757     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00086-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  29 in total

1.  Chapter 9: options for summarizing medical test performance in the absence of a "gold standard".

Authors:  Thomas A Trikalinos; Cynthia M Balion
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The true treatment benefit is unpredictable in clinical trials using surrogate outcome measured with diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicza; Michel Cucherat; Francois Gueyffier; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and testing strategies. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 58.

Authors:  Michael Balls; Patric Amcoff; Susanne Bremer; Silvia Casati; Sandra Coecke; Richard Clothier; Robert Combes; Raffaella Corvi; Rodger Curren; Chantra Eskes; Julia Fentem; Laura Gribaldo; Marlies Halder; Thomas Hartung; Sebastian Hoffmann; Leonard Schectman; Laurie Scott; Horst Spielmann; William Stokes; Raymond Tice; Drew Wagner; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Bayesian meta-analysis of the accuracy of a test for tuberculous pleuritis in the absence of a gold standard reference.

Authors:  Nandini Dendukuri; Ian Schiller; Lawrence Joseph; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Challenges with diagnoses: sketchy reference standards.

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

Review 6.  Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Lei Nie; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 7.  Cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Dorothy J Wiley; Bradley J Monk; Emmanuel Masongsong; Kristina Morgan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Classifying Injuries in Young Children as Abusive or Accidental: Reliability and Accuracy of an Expert Panel Approach.

Authors:  Douglas J Lorenz; Mary Clyde Pierce; Kim Kaczor; Rachel P Berger; Gina Bertocci; Bruce E Herman; Sandra Herr; Kent P Hymel; Carole Jenny; John M Leventhal; Karen Sheehan; Noel Zuckerbraun
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Hongfei Guo; Yijie Zhou
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  Summary diagnostic validity of commonly used maternal major depression disorder case finding instruments in the United States: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur H Owora; Hélène Carabin; Jessica Reese; Tabitha Garwe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.