Literature DB >> 21525421

Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence in meta-analysis.

Jialiang Li1, Jason P Fine.   

Abstract

We consider modeling the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on the disease prevalence in diagnostic accuracy studies. Many meta-analyses compare test accuracy across studies and fail to incorporate the possible connection between the accuracy measures and the prevalence. We propose a Pearson type correlation coefficient and an estimating equation-based regression framework to help understand such a practical dependence. The results we derive may then be used to better interpret the results from meta-analyses. In the biomedical examples analyzed in this paper, the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers are shown to be associated with prevalence, providing insights into the utility of these biomarkers in low- and high-prevalence populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525421      PMCID: PMC4042906          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  13 in total

1.  A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.

Authors:  C M Rutter; C A Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Jeroen G Lijmer; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Siem H Heisterkamp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy assessment studies with varying number of thresholds.

Authors:  V Dukic; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Jonathan J Deeks; Matthias Egger; Penny Whiting; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  L R Arends; T H Hamza; J C van Houwelingen; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; T Stijnen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Regression methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test data.

Authors:  C M Rutter; C A Gatsonis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.

Authors:  H Brenner; O Gefeller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.

Authors:  S D Walter; L M Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

Authors:  L E Moses; D Shapiro; B Littenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Lei Nie; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  The Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Detection of Extramural Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Sangwon Han; Chong Hyun Suh; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Jin Liu; Huangdi Yi; Ben-Chang Shia; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comparative performance of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and EIA for HIV screening in a multiethnic region of China.

Authors:  Xiaohui Bi; Hongxia Ning; Tingting Wang; Dongdong Li; Yongming Liu; Tingfu Yang; Jiansheng Yu; Chuanmin Tao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brett D Thombs; Andrea Benedetti; Lorie A Kloda; Brooke Levis; Ioana Nicolau; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Dean McMillan; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Russell J Steele; Roy C Ziegelstein
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-27

Review 7.  Case finding and screening clinical utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) for depression in primary care: a diagnostic meta-analysis of 40 studies.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Motahare Yadegarfar; John Gill; Brendon Stubbs
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-03-09

8.  Congo red test for identification of preeclampsia: Results of a prospective diagnostic case-control study in Bangladesh and Mexico.

Authors:  Hillary Bracken; Irina A Buhimschi; Anisur Rahman; Patricio R Sanhueza Smith; Jesmin Pervin; Salma Rouf; Manuel Bousieguez; Lourdes García López; Catalin S Buhimschi; Thomas Easterling; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-12-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.