Literature DB >> 23800803

Characterization of the impact to PET quantification and image quality of an anterior array surface coil for PET/MR imaging.

Scott D Wollenweber1, Gaspar Delso, Timothy Deller, David Goldhaber, Martin Hüllner, Patrick Veit-Haibach.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine the impact to PET quantification, image quality and possible diagnostic impact of an anterior surface array used in a combined PET/MR imaging system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extended oval phantom and 15 whole-body FDG PET/CT subjects were re-imaged for one bed position following placement of an anterior array coil at a clinically realistic position. The CT scan, used for PET attenuation correction, did not include the coil. Comparison, including liver SUV(mean), was performed between the coil present and absent images using two methods of PET reconstruction. Due to the time delay between PET scans, a model was used to account for average physiologic time change of SUV.
RESULTS: On phantom data, neglecting the coil caused a mean bias of -8.2% for non-TOF/PSF reconstruction, and -7.3% with TOF/PSF. On clinical data, the liver SUV neglecting the coil presence fell by -6.1% (± 6.5%) for non-TOF/PSF reconstruction; respectively -5.2% (± 5.3%) with TOF/PSF. All FDG-avid features seen with TOF/PSF were also seen with non-TOF/PSF reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Neglecting coil attenuation for this anterior array coil results in a small but significant reduction in liver SUV(mean) but was not found to change the clinical interpretation of the PET images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23800803     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-013-0388-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  22 in total

1.  Optimizing imaging time for improved performance in oncology PET studies.

Authors:  Joseph A Thie; Karl F Hubner; Gary T Smith
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Roel Van Holen; Pieter Mollet; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of the attenuation properties of MR equipment for its use in a whole-body PET/MR scanner.

Authors:  G Delso; A Martinez-Möller; R A Bundschuh; R Ladebeck; Y Candidus; D Faul; S I Ziegler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Bernd Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT.

Authors:  Marco Wiesmüller; Harald H Quick; Bharath Navalpakkam; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Philipp Ritt; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Torsten Kuwert; Carl C von Gall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Konstantin Holzapfel; Anja Pickhard; Dennys Löffelbein; Ivan Santi; Ernst J Rummeny; Sibylle Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Is liver SUV stable over time in ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging?

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Xavier Adhoute; Henri de Clermont; Roger Marthan
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2011-08-30

9.  Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Jens Langner; Frank Hofheinz; Jan Petr; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Ivan Platzek; Jörg Steinbach; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Stephen J Sawiak; Karin Knesaurek; Jagat Narula; Valentin Fuster; Joseph Machac; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Accurate PET/MR quantification using time of flight MLAA image reconstruction.

Authors:  R Boellaard; M B M Hofman; O S Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; David D Faul; Niels Oesingmann; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 4.  MR Imaging-Guided Attenuation Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-01-26

5.  Investigating the state-of-the-art in whole-body MR-based attenuation correction: an intra-individual, inter-system, inventory study on three clinical PET/MR systems.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Martin L Lassen; Ronald Boellaard; Gaspar Delso; Maqsood Yaqub; Bernhard Sattler; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Dose Optimization in TOF-PET/MR Compared to TOF-PET/CT.

Authors:  Marcelo A Queiroz; Gaspar Delso; Scott Wollenweber; Timothy Deller; Konstantinos Zeimpekis; Martin Huellner; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Gustav von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PET Image Quality Improvement for Simultaneous PET/MRI with a Lightweight MRI Surface Coil.

Authors:  Timothy W Deller; Nicholas K Mathew; Samuel A Hurley; Chad M Bobb; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.

Authors:  Guobing Liu; Tuoyu Cao; Lingzhi Hu; Jiaxu Zheng; Lifang Pang; Pengcheng Hu; Yushen Gu; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.