Literature DB >> 33141004

PET Image Quality Improvement for Simultaneous PET/MRI with a Lightweight MRI Surface Coil.

Timothy W Deller1, Nicholas K Mathew1, Samuel A Hurley1, Chad M Bobb1, Alan B McMillan1.   

Abstract

Background During simultaneous PET/MRI, flexible MRI surface coils that lay on the patient are often omitted from PET attenuation correction processing, leading to quantification bias in PET images. Purpose To identify potential PET image quality improvement by using a recently developed lightweight MRI coil technology for the anterior array (AA) surface coil in both a phantom and in vivo study. Materials and Methods A phantom study and a prospective in vivo study were performed with a PET/CT scanner under three conditions: (a) no MRI surface coil (standard of reference), (b) traditional AA coil, and (c) lightweight AA coil. AA coils were not used in attenuation correction processing to emulate clinical PET/MRI. For the phantom study, PET images were reconstructed with and without time of flight (TOF) to assess quantification accuracy and uniformity. The in vivo study consisted of 10 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; six men) referred for a PET/CT oncologic examination who had undergone imaging between October 2019 and February 2020. Assessment of image quantification bias (defined as the standard error of the mean values) was conducted by comparing mean liver region of interest standardized uptake values with the no-coil standard of reference. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to establish significance. Results For TOF and non-TOF, respectively, the phantom study revealed a mean PET quantification bias of -9.0% and -8.6% with the traditional AA coil and a mean PET quantification bias of -4.3% and -4.0% with the lightweight AA coil. The coefficients of variation reduced from 4.3% and 6.2% with the traditional AA coil to 2.1% and 2.7% with the lightweight AA coil, which demonstrated a homogeneity benefit from the lightweight coil that was greater with, versus without, TOF reconstruction. For the in vivo study, the mean liver standardized uptake value error was -5.9% with the traditional AA coil (P = .002 vs no coil) and -2.4% with the lightweight AA coil (P = .004 vs no coil). Conclusion The lightweight anterior array coil reduced PET image quantification bias by more than 50% compared with the traditional coil. Using the lightweight coil and performing time of flight-based reconstruction each reduced the variation of error. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33141004      PMCID: PMC7771991          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of the attenuation properties of MR equipment for its use in a whole-body PET/MR scanner.

Authors:  G Delso; A Martinez-Möller; R A Bundschuh; R Ladebeck; Y Candidus; D Faul; S I Ziegler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Steve Kohlmyer; Chi Liu; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study.

Authors:  L Tellmann; H H Quick; A Bockisch; H Herzog; T Beyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Integrated PET/MR imaging: automatic attenuation correction of flexible RF coils.

Authors:  René Kartmann; Daniel H Paulus; Harald Braun; Bassim Aklan; Susanne Ziegler; Bharath K Navalpakkam; Markus Lentschig; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system.

Authors:  Alexander M Grant; Timothy W Deller; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Sri Harsha Maramraju; Gaspar Delso; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Attenuation correction for flexible magnetic resonance coils in combined magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; Claudia Calcagno; Philip M Robson; Venkatesh Mani; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; David D Faul; Niels Oesingmann; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 8.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Screen-printed flexible MRI receive coils.

Authors:  Joseph R Corea; Anita M Flynn; Balthazar Lechêne; Greig Scott; Galen D Reed; Peter J Shin; Michael Lustig; Ana C Arias
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A high-impedance detector-array glove for magnetic resonance imaging of the hand.

Authors:  Bei Zhang; Daniel K Sodickson; Martijn A Cloos
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 25.671

View more
  1 in total

1.  Scan-rescan measurement repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of vascular inflammation.

Authors:  Philip M Robson; Audrey Kaufman; Alison Pruzan; Marc R Dweck; Maria-Giovanna Trivieri; Ronan Abgral; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Patrick M Brunner; Emma Guttman; Zahi A Fayad; Venkatesh Mani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.872

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.