Literature DB >> 20647598

Evaluation of the attenuation properties of MR equipment for its use in a whole-body PET/MR scanner.

G Delso1, A Martinez-Möller, R A Bundschuh, R Ladebeck, Y Candidus, D Faul, S I Ziegler.   

Abstract

The combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MR) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanners can provide a powerful tool for clinical diagnosis and investigation. Among the challenges of developing a combined scanner, obtaining attenuation maps for PET reconstruction is of critical importance. This requires accounting for the presence of MR hardware in the field of view. The attenuation introduced by this hardware cannot be obtained from MR data. We propose the creation of attenuation models of MR hardware, to be registered into the MR-based attenuation map prior to PET reconstruction. Two steps were followed to assess the viability of this method. First, transmission and emission measurements were performed on MR components (RF coils and medical probes). The severity of the artifacts in the reconstructed PET images was evaluated. Secondly, a high-exposure computed tomography (CT) scan was used to obtain a model of a head coil. This model was registered into the attenuation map of PET/CT scans of a uniform phantom fitted with the coil. The resulting PET images were compared to the PET/CT reconstruction in the absence of coils. The artifacts introduced by misregistration of the model were studied. The transmission scans revealed 17% count loss due to the presence of head and neck coils in the field of view. Important sources of attenuation were found in the lock, signal cables and connectors. However, the worst source of attenuation was the casing between both coils. None of the measured medical probes introduced a significant amount of attenuation. Concerning the attenuation model of the head coil, reconstructed PET images with model-based correction were comparable to the reference PET/CT reconstruction. However, inaccuracies greater than 1-2 mm in the axial positioning of the model led to important artifacts. In conclusion, the results show that model-based attenuation correction is possible. Using a high-exposure scan to create an attenuation model of the coils has been proved feasible. However, adequate registration of the model is mandatory.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647598     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/15/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the impact to PET quantification and image quality of an anterior array surface coil for PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Scott D Wollenweber; Gaspar Delso; Timothy Deller; David Goldhaber; Martin Hüllner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  PET/MR in prostate cancer: technical aspects and potential diagnostic value.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Moeller; Sebastian Fürst; Konstantin Holzapfel; Tobias Maurer; Sibylle Ziegler; Stephan Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Stephen J Sawiak; Karin Knesaurek; Jagat Narula; Valentin Fuster; Joseph Machac; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Steve Kohlmyer; Chi Liu; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of sequential PET/MRI using a newly developed mobile PET system for brain imaging.

Authors:  Mizue Suzuki; Yasutaka Fushimi; Tomohisa Okada; Takuya Hinoda; Ryusuke Nakamoto; Yoshiki Arakawa; Nobukatsu Sawamoto; Kaori Togashi; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Pieter Mollet; Yannick Berker; Volkmar Schulz; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Accurate PET/MR quantification using time of flight MLAA image reconstruction.

Authors:  R Boellaard; M B M Hofman; O S Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; David D Faul; Niels Oesingmann; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 9.  MR Imaging-Guided Attenuation Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-01-26

10.  Impact of improved attenuation correction featuring a bone atlas and truncation correction on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR.

Authors:  Mark Oehmigen; Maike E Lindemann; Marcel Gratz; Julian Kirchner; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu; Jan Ole Blumhagen; Matthias Fenchel; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.