Literature DB >> 22047365

The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification.

Vincent Keereman1, Roel Van Holen, Pieter Mollet, Stefaan Vandenberghe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate attenuation correction is important for PET quantification. Often, a segmented attenuation map is used, especially in MRI-based attenuation correction. As deriving the attenuation map from MRI images is difficult, different errors can be present in the segmented attenuation map. The goal of this paper is to determine the effect of these errors on quantification.
METHODS: The authors simulated the digital XCAT phantom using the GATE Monte Carlo simulation framework and a model of the Philips Gemini TF. A whole body scan was simulated, spanning an axial field of view of 70 cm. A total of fifteen lesions were placed in the lung, liver, spine, colon, prostate, and femur. The acquired data were reconstructed with a reference attenuation map and with different attenuation maps that were modified to reflect common segmentation errors. The quantitative difference between reconstructed images was evaluated.
RESULTS: Segmentation into five tissue classes, namely cortical bone, spongeous bone, soft tissue, lung, and air yielded errors below 5%. Large errors were caused by ignoring lung tissue (up to 45%) or cortical bone (up to 17%). The interpatient variability of lung attenuation coefficients can lead to errors of 10% and more. Up to 20% tissue misclassification from bone to soft tissue yielded errors below 5%. The same applies for up to 10% misclassification from lung to air.
CONCLUSIONS: When using a segmented attenuation map, at least five different tissue types should be considered: cortical bone, spongeous bone, soft tissue, lung, and air. Furthermore, the interpatient variability of lung attenuation coefficients should be taken into account. Limited misclassification from bone to soft tissue and from lung to air is acceptable, as these do not lead to relevant errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22047365     DOI: 10.1118/1.3651640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  42 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the impact to PET quantification and image quality of an anterior array surface coil for PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Scott D Wollenweber; Gaspar Delso; Timothy Deller; David Goldhaber; Martin Hüllner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Stephen J Sawiak; Karin Knesaurek; Jagat Narula; Valentin Fuster; Joseph Machac; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Generation of a Four-Class Attenuation Map for MRI-Based Attenuation Correction of PET Data in the Head Area Using a Novel Combination of STE/Dixon-MRI and FCM Clustering.

Authors:  Parisa Khateri; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Amir Homayoun Jafari; Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Afshin Akbarzadeh; Mohsen Shojae Moghadam; Arvin Aryan; Pardis Ghafarian; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CT.

Authors:  Jason Bini; Philip M Robson; Claudia Calcagno; Mootaz Eldib; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-15

6.  Quantitative simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jinsong Ouyang; Yoann Petibon; Chuan Huang; Timothy G Reese; Aleksandra L Kolnick; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-03

7.  Impact of Tissue Classification in MRI-Guided Attenuation Correction on Whole-Body Patlak PET/MRI.

Authors:  Mingzan Zhuang; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Pieter Mollet; Yannick Berker; Volkmar Schulz; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Bias atlases for segmentation-based PET attenuation correction using PET-CT and MR.

Authors:  Jinsong Ouyang; Se Young Chun; Yoann Petibon; Ali A Bonab; Nathaniel Alpert; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.