Literature DB >> 23771670

Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Hui Ke1, Xin Chen1, Yu-Dong Liu1, De-Sheng Ye1, Yu-Xia He1, Shi-Ling Chen2.   

Abstract

This study explored the cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria. In this retrospective cohort study, 479 poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria in the first ovarian stimulation IVF cycle between July 2006 and January 2012 in our IVF centre were included. The cumulative live birth rate was calculated by optimistic and pessimistic methods. The cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria was 12.7%-20.5%. The three-cycle cumulative live birth rate was 18.5%-24.5%, 13.2%-27.4% and 8.6%-14.9% for poor responders aged ≤35 years, 36-39 years and ≥40 years, respectively. In conclusion, poor responders according to the Bologna criteria can receive an acceptable cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles, especially poor responders aged <40 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771670     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1134-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  21 in total

1.  A more realistic approach to the cumulative pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A M Stolwijk; C J Hamilton; J M Hollanders; L A Bastiaans; G A Zielhuis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  An initial low response predicts poor outcome in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection despite improved ovarian response in consecutive cycles.

Authors:  Zdravka Veleva; Ilkka Y Järvelä; Sinikka Nuojua-Huttunen; Hannu Martikainen; Juha S Tapanainen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?

Authors:  George B Inge; Peter R Brinsden; Kay T Elder
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  A P Ferraretti; A La Marca; B C J M Fauser; B Tarlatzis; G Nargund; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Age and ovarian reserve are distinct predictive factors of cycle outcome in low responders.

Authors:  Julie Galey-Fontaine; Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin; Rachid Chaïbi; Nathalie Massin; Jean-Noël Hugues
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples.

Authors:  X M Zhen; J Qiao; R Li; L N Wang; P Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The probability of successful IVF outcome after poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Pia Saldeen; Karin Källen; Per Sundström
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Contributions of in vitro fertilization to knowledge of the reproductive endocrinology of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  D L Healy; S Okamato; L Morrow; A Thomas; M Jones; V McLachlan; M Besanko; F Martinez; P A Rogers
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-02

10.  Correlation between number of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm infection.

Authors:  Tanya Timeva; Tanya Milachich; Irena Antonova; Tanya Arabaji; Atanas Shterev; Hatim A Omar
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2006-06-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Live birth and cumulative live birth rates in expected poor ovarian responders defined by the Bologna criteria following IVF/ICSI treatment.

Authors:  Joyce Chai; Vivian Chi-Yan Lee; Tracy Wing-Yee Yeung; Hang Wun Raymond Li; Raymond Wun-Hang Li; Pak-Chung Ho; Ernest Hung-Yu Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Giuliano M Bedoschi; Alessandro Conforti; Peter Humaidan; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Cumulative live birth rates for low-prognosis women over 5 years or 9 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Di Chen; Xi Shen; Li Wang; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.