Literature DB >> 21505041

ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.

A P Ferraretti1, A La Marca, B C J M Fauser, B Tarlatzis, G Nargund, L Gianaroli.   

Abstract

The definition presented here represents the first realistic attempt by the scientific community to standardize the definition of poor ovarian response (POR) in a simple and reproducible manner. POR to ovarian stimulation usually indicates a reduction in follicular response, resulting in a reduced number of retrieved oocytes. It has been recognized that, in order to define the poor response in IVF, at least two of the following three features must be present: (i) advanced maternal age or any other risk factor for POR; (ii) a previous POR; and (iii) an abnormal ovarian reserve test (ORT). Two episodes of POR after maximal stimulation are sufficient to define a patient as poor responder in the absence of advanced maternal age or abnormal ORT. By definition, the term POR refers to the ovarian response, and therefore, one stimulated cycle is considered essential for the diagnosis of POR. However, patients of advanced age with an abnormal ORT may be classified as poor responders since both advanced age and an abnormal ORT may indicate reduced ovarian reserve and act as a surrogate of ovarian stimulation cycle outcome. In this case, the patients should be more properly defined as 'expected poor responder'. If this definition of POR is uniformly adapted as the 'minimal' criteria needed to select patients for future clinical trials, more homogeneous populations will be tested for any new protocols. Finally, by reducing bias caused by spurious POR definitions, it will be possible to compare results and to draw reliable conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505041     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  405 in total

1.  A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Ciro Dresch Martinhago; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Improved pregnancy rates with luteinizing hormone supplementation in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Authors:  Nicole D Paterson; Shu C Foong; Calvin A Greene
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder--a plea for universal definitions.

Authors:  J Cohen; N Chabbert-Buffet; E Darai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  The impact of FMR1 gene mutations on human reproduction and development: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Noto; Conor Harrity; David Walsh; Kevin Marron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Authors:  Hui Ke; Xin Chen; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Yu-Xia He; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

6.  Testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in cancer survivors with no available cryopreserved sperm.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Luciano Negri; Annamaria Baggiani; Emanuela Morenghi; Elena Albani; Carola Maria Conca Dioguardi; Cristina Specchia; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Ludmila Bercaire; Sara Mb Nogueira; Priscila Cm Lima; Vanessa R Alves; Nilka Donadio; Artur Dzik; Mario Cavagna
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-03-01

8.  Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Linli Hu; Zhiqin Bu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Jun Zhai; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

9.  Urinary concentrations of phenols and phthalate metabolites reflect extracellular vesicle microRNA expression in follicular fluid.

Authors:  Rosie M Martinez; Russ Hauser; Liming Liang; Abdallah Mansur; Michal Adir; Laura Dioni; Catherine Racowsky; Valentina Bollati; Andrea A Baccarelli; Ronit Machtinger
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Development of an optimal protocol for isolation and purification of human granulosa cells in patients with different ovarian reserves.

Authors:  Ying Han; Ge Gao; Shuang Li; Nan Xiao; Yinfeng Zhang; Haining Luo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.