Literature DB >> 18202912

The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples.

X M Zhen1, J Qiao, R Li, L N Wang, P Liu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the prevalence, predictor of clinical pregnancy and possible aetiology of poor ovarian response (POR) in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in Chinese.
METHODS: A total of 4,600 retrieval oocyte cycles were finished between July 1, 2004 and April 30, 2006. Poor ovarian responses were observed in 426 patients of 472 cycles undergoing IVF, which were selected on the same retrieve oocyte day as the control group. The outcome of IVF-ET and the common markers of ovarian reserve were compared.
RESULTS: The patients had previous ovarian surgery in 64 cycles of 472 poor ovarian response cycles. The group with poor ovarian response has significant differences in comparison with the control group in age (36.6 +/- 4.2 vs 33.3 +/- 4.04), ovarian surgeries (13.6 vs 2.8%), dose of gonadotrophin (58.5 +/- 15.8 vs 40.6 +/- 17.0), fertilization rate (71.5 vs 86%) and pregnancy rate (14.8 vs 36.7%). In the group with poor ovarian responses, clinical pregnancy rate declined significantly in women aged >40 years than in those aged < or = 40 years (2.8 vs 18.5%, P < 0.001). The age, basal serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), basal serum luteinizing hormone (LH), basal oestradiol (E2) concentrations, FSH to LH ratio and the antral follicle count (AFC) are the common markers of ovarian reserve in our center. We found that there were significant differences in age, basal FSH, FSH-to-LH ratio and the antral follicle count. But no statistical significant differences were observed in basal oestradiol concentration and basal serum LH when comparing the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to study the relation among age, FSH, LH, E2, AFC and clinical pregnancy, and the age (odds ratio, 0.863; 95% confidence interval, 0.805-0.925; p = 0.000) was the only variable selected.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that the prevalence of poor ovarian response in Chinese is 11.9%. Previous ovarian surgery is associated with poor ovarian responses. The pregnancy rate of women with poor ovarian response is low in IVF-ET, especially the decline in clinical pregnancy rate of women aged >40 years became accelerated. Correct identification of those who are at risk for POR prior to stimulation is helpful in tailoring the best stimulation protocol to individual patients. Chronological age significantly improved the prediction of clinical pregnancy of poor ovarian responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18202912      PMCID: PMC2582105          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-007-9187-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  28 in total

1.  Management of poor responders in IVF.

Authors:  H Lashen; W Ledger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  M A Akman; H F Erden; S B Tosun; N Bayazit; E Aksoy; M Bahceci
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.

Authors:  Togas Tulandi; Aref Sammour; David Valenti; Timothy J Child; Laurent Seti; Seang Lin Tan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Prediction of individual response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by means of a clomiphene citrate challenge test.

Authors:  E Loumaye; J M Billion; J M Mine; I Psalti; M Pensis; K Thomas
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve.

Authors:  László F J M M Bancsi; Frank J M Broekmans; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Frank H de Jong; J Dik F Habbema; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an IVF programme.

Authors:  E H Ng; O S Tang; P C Ho
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  László F J M M Bancsi; Frank J M Broekmans; Ben W J Mol; J Dik F Habbema; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Francesco Morgia; Marco Sbracia; Mauro Schimberni; Annalise Giallonardo; Claudio Piscitelli; Pierluigi Giannini; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome.

Authors:  C Kailasam; S D Keay; P Wilson; W C L Ford; J M Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist in ovarian stimulation of poor responders undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Sozos J Fasouliotis; Neri Laufer; Shelley Sabbagh-Ehrlich; Aby Lewin; Arye Hurwitz; Alex Simon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  15 in total

1.  Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Authors:  Hui Ke; Xin Chen; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Yu-Xia He; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

2.  Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Giovanna Sighinolfi; Alessandra Tirelli; Cindy Argento; Claudia Re; Daniela Tagliasacchi; Tiziana Marsella; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with gonadotrophins in vitro fertilization for poor ovarian responders: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoying Yu; Jian Ruan; Lian-Ping He; Weihua Hu; Qinyang Xu; Jingwen Tang; Jian Jiang; Jun Han; Yi-Feng Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 4.  Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?

Authors:  Filippo Ubaldi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Rosario D'Anna; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Testing for Ovarian Reserve in Assisted Reproduction programs: the current point of view.

Authors:  F J Broekmans
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

6.  The effects of fresh embryo transfers and elective frozen/thawed embryo transfers on pregancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders as defined by the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Serdar Çelik; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Erbil Yağmur; Kübra Boynukalın; Dilek Cengiz Çelik; Necati Fındıklı; Sevim Purisa; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  The effect of the pooling method on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Serdar Çelik; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Dilek Cengiz Çelik; Kübra Boynukalın; Remzi Abalı; Sevim Purisa; Erbil Yağmur; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 8.  Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Giuliano M Bedoschi; Alessandro Conforti; Peter Humaidan; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  GnRH agonist long protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol for various aged patients with diminished ovarian reserve: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ming-Chao Huang; Shu-Ling Tzeng; Chun-I Lee; Hsiu-Hui Chen; Chun-Chia Huang; Tsung-Hsien Lee; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy and safety of Ding-Kun-Dan for female infertility patients with predicted poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Saihua Ma; Ruihong Ma; Tian Xia; Masoud Afnan; Xueru Song; Fengqin Xu; Guimin Hao; Fangfang Zhu; Jingpei Han; Zhimei Zhao
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.