Literature DB >> 15689347

Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?

George B Inge1, Peter R Brinsden, Kay T Elder.   

Abstract

As part of a learning exercise to assess the efficiency of oocyte utilization after controlled ovarian stimulation, we compared historical data from the publications of Steptoe and Edwards describing their early experiences in Oldham and at Bourn Hall with retrospective data from IVF and ICSI cycles carried out at Bourn Hall Clinic during the year 2000. For the purpose of analysing the more recent data, patients were subdivided into groups by age (< or = 37 years and > or = 38 years) and by oocyte yield (low, intermediate and high). In patients less than 38 years of age, live birth rates were equivalent in each group, irrespective of the number of oocytes retrieved. Patients who yielded low numbers of oocytes (1-5) utilized an average of 9.6 oocytes per live birth, compared with 25.1 and 51.5 in those who yielded intermediate (6-16) and high (16+) numbers of oocytes. The comparison with historical data suggests that the 'efficiency' of oocyte utilization has not improved significantly since the early 1980s, despite 25 years' experience of controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689347     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

1.  A shared egg donor program: which is the minimum number of oocytes to be allocated?

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Marcelo Dominguez; Gabriel Fiszbajn; Sergio Papier; Mariano Lavolpe; Carlos Sueldo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Authors:  Hui Ke; Xin Chen; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Yu-Xia He; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

3.  Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; George W Smith; James J Ireland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Portrait of an oocyte: our obscure origin.

Authors:  Roger Gosden; Bora Lee
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Age-associated alteration of oocyte-specific gene expression in polar bodies: potential markers of oocyte competence.

Authors:  Ze-Xu Jiao; Min Xu; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Detection and quantification of maternal-effect gene transcripts in mouse second polar bodies: potential markers of embryo developmental competence.

Authors:  Ze-Xu Jiao; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Embryotropic actions of follistatin: paracrine and autocrine mediators of oocyte competence and embryo developmental progression.

Authors:  Sandeep K Rajput; Kyungbon Lee; Guo Zhenhua; Liu Di; Joseph K Folger; George W Smith
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Human pre-implantation embryo development.

Authors:  Kathy K Niakan; Jinnuo Han; Roger A Pedersen; Carlos Simon; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 9.  Untapped Reserves: Controlling Primordial Follicle Growth Activation.

Authors:  Amanda Kallen; Alex J Polotsky; Joshua Johnson
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Negative impact of high doses of follicle-stimulating hormone during superovulation on the ovulatory follicle function in small ovarian reserve dairy heifers†.

Authors:  Kaitlin R Karl; Fermin Jimenez-Krassel; Emily Gibbings; Janet L H Ireland; Zaramasina L Clark; Robert J Tempelman; Keith E Latham; James J Ireland
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.