Literature DB >> 8671287

A more realistic approach to the cumulative pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization.

A M Stolwijk1, C J Hamilton, J M Hollanders, L A Bastiaans, G A Zielhuis.   

Abstract

As most studies overestimate the cumulative pregnancy rate, a method is proposed to estimate a more realistic cumulative pregnancy rate by taking into account the reasons for an early cessation of treatment with in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Three methods for calculating cumulative pregnancy rates were compared. The first method assumed that those who stopped treatment had no chance at all of pregnancy. The second method, the one used most often, assumed the same probability of pregnancy for those who stopped as for those who continued. The third method assumed that only those who stopped treatment, because of a medical indication, had no chance at all of pregnancy and that the others who stopped had the same probability of pregnancy as those who continued treatment. Data were used from 616 women treated at the University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The cumulative pregnancy rates after five initiated IVF cycles for the three calculation methods were in the ranges 37-51% for the positive pregnancy test result, 33-55% for a clinical pregnancy and 30-56% for an ongoing pregnancy. As expected, the first method underestimated the cumulative pregnancy rate and the second overestimated it. The third method produced the most realistic cumulative pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8671287     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/11.3.660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christianne M Verhaak; Jesper M J Smeenk; Andrea W M Evers; Agnes van Minnen; Jan A M Kremer; Floris W Kraaimaat
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

2.  Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Authors:  Hui Ke; Xin Chen; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Yu-Xia He; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

3.  Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tham; Karen Schliep; Joseph Stanford
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  IVF births and pregnancies: an exploration of two methods of assessment using life-table analysis.

Authors:  R Deonandan; M K Campbell; T Ostbye; I Tummon; J Robertson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Cumulative live birth rates in low-prognosis women.

Authors:  Jori A Leijdekkers; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Theodora C van Tilborg; Simone C Oudshoorn; Ron J T van Golde; Annemieke Hoek; Cornelis B Lambalk; Jan Peter de Bruin; Kathrin Fleischer; Monique H Mochtar; Walter K H Kuchenbecker; Joop S E Laven; Ben Willem J Mol; Helen L Torrance; Frank J M Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Cumulative live birth rates for low-prognosis women over 5 years or 9 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Di Chen; Xi Shen; Li Wang; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates.

Authors:  S Gameiro; C M Verhaak; J A M Kremer; J Boivin
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 15.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.