Literature DB >> 22036048

A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel?

Nikolaos P Polyzos1, Paul Devroey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the definitions for "poor ovarian responders" used among randomized trials for the treatment of women with impaired response to stimulation.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
SETTING: None. PATIENT(S): Poor ovarian responders. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment modalities for the management of poor ovarian responders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number and nature of the criteria used to define poor ovarian response to stimulation and threshold values used. RESULT(S): Among 47 randomized trials, 41 different definitions for the patients with poor ovarian response have been used. No more than 3 trials used the same definition, whereas even trials from the same research groups used different definitions across different trials. None of the criteria used was adopted in more than 50% of the trials. Age and antral follicle count were adopted only in 9% of the definitions, whereas the criteria of number of follicles on the final stimulation day and number of oocytes retrieved were used in more than 40% of the trials; nonetheless, even for these criteria, the threshold values were consistently different. CONCLUSION(S): The variability regarding the definition of poor ovarian responders appears to be striking. Although the Bologna criteria developed by European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology consensus in 2011 aim to define a consistent group of patients, their applicability needs to be tested through clinical trials. Meanwhile, meta-analyses of the currently available trials should be strongly discouraged because they may lead to the adoption of interventions of ambiguous value.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036048     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  60 in total

1.  Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.

Authors:  Hui Ke; Xin Chen; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Yu-Xia He; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

2.  Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Linli Hu; Zhiqin Bu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Jun Zhai; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

3.  Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill; Anthony Propst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols.

Authors:  Myrto Papamentzelopoulou; Sofoklis Stavros; Despoina Mavrogianni; Christos Kalantzis; Dimitrios Loutradis; Petros Drakakis
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Romina Pesce; Mariana Miguens; Carlos E Sueldo; Karinna Lattes; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Efficacy of the delayed start antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in Bologna poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Yang; Nenghui Liu; Yanping Li; Lei Zhang; Rongya Yue
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; George Salamalekis; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; George Basios; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Nikolaos Papantoniou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sfakianoudis Konstantinos; Tsioulou Petroula; Maziotis Evangelos; Giannelou Polina; Glava Argyro; Grigoriadis Sokratis; Rapani Anna; Nezos Andrianos; Pantou Agni; Koutsilieris Michael; Pantos Konstantinos; Mastorakos George; Simopoulou Mara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The Role of Traditional Chinese Formula Ding-Kun Pill (DKP) in Expected Poor Ovarian Response Women (POSEIDON Group 4) Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jing-Yan Song; Dan-Dan Gao; Xian-Ling Cao; Shan Xiang; Yan-Hua Chen; Yi-Li Teng; Xiu-Fang Li; Hai-Ping Liu; Fu-Xin Wang; Bin Zhang; Li-Hua Xu; Li Zhou; Xiang-Hong Huang; Zhen-Gao Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.