Literature DB >> 23759399

Impact of glucose measurement processing delays on clinical accuracy and relevance.

Sujit R Jangam1, Gary Hayter, Timothy C Dunn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a hospital setting, glucose is often measured from venous blood in the clinical laboratory. However, laboratory glucose measurements are typically not available in real time. In practice, turn-around times for laboratory measurements can be minutes to hours. This analysis assesses the impact of turn-around time on the effective clinical accuracy of laboratory measurements.
METHODS: Data obtained from an earlier study with 58 subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were used for this analysis. In the study, glucose measurements using a YSI glucose analyzer were obtained from venous blood samples every 15 min while the subjects were at the health care facility. To simulate delayed laboratory results, each YSI glucose value from a subject was paired with one from a later time point (from the same subject) separated by 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. To assess the clinical accuracy of a delayed YSI result relative to a real-time result, the percentage of YSI pairs that meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197:2003(E) standard for glucose measurement accuracy (±15 mg/dl for blood glucose < 75 mg/dl, ±20% for blood glucose ≥ 75 mg/dl) was calculated.
RESULTS: It was observed that delays of 15 min or more reduce clinical accuracy below the ISO 15197:2003(E) recommendation of 95%. The accuracy was less than 65% for delays of 60 min.
CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that processing delays in glucose measurements reduce the clinical relevance of results in patients with T1DM and may similarly degrade the clinical value of measurements in other patient populations.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23759399      PMCID: PMC3869134          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Linda A Gonder-Frederick; Daniel J Cox; William L Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Accuracy of the 5-day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements.

Authors:  Richard L Weinstein; Sherwyn L Schwartz; Ronald L Brazg; Jolyon R Bugler; Thomas A Peyser; Geoffrey V McGarraugh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Stacey Anderson; Lutz Heinemann; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Dean R Chittock; Steve Yu-Shuo Su; Deborah Blair; Denise Foster; Vinay Dhingra; Rinaldo Bellomo; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; William R Henderson; Paul C Hébert; Stephane Heritier; Daren K Heyland; Colin McArthur; Ellen McDonald; Imogen Mitchell; John A Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Julie Potter; Bruce G Robinson; Juan J Ronco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Evaluating stat testing options in an academic health center: therapeutic turnaround time and staff satisfaction.

Authors:  M L Kilgore; S J Steindel; J A Smith
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  The fiscal consequences of central vs distributed testing of glucose.

Authors:  J W Winkelman; D R Wybenga; M J Tanasijevic
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical application.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; William L Clarke; Marc Breton; Kenneth Brayman; Anthony McCall
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Comparison of the accuracy of the HemoCue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alexander D M Stork; Hans Kemperman; D Willem Erkelens; Thiemo F Veneman
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.664

10.  Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Marieke A Prinsen; Johannes L Willems; Johannes G Van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C for Treatment of Sepsis on Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Readings.

Authors:  Anna Peyton Howell; Jenna L Parrett; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

3.  Glucose concentrations in enterally fed preterm infants.

Authors:  Alejandra Barrero-Castillero; Wenyang Mao; Ann R Stark; David Miedema; DeWayne M Pursley; Heather H Burris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.521

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.