Literature DB >> 23757158

Evaluation of an independent linear model for acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner and implications for acoustic noise reduction.

Ziyue Wu1, Yoon-Chul Kim, Michael C K Khoo, Krishna S Nayak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate an independent linear model for gradient acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner, and to explore implications for acoustic noise reduction in routine imaging.
METHODS: Acoustic noise generated from each physical gradient axis was modeled as the prescribed gradient waveform passed through a linear time-invariant system. Homogeneity and superposition properties were experimentally determined. We also developed a new method to correct relative time shifts between the measured impulse responses for different physical gradient axes. Model accuracy was determined by comparing predicted and measured sound using normalized energy difference. Transfer functions were also measured in subjects with different body habitus and at multiple microphone locations.
RESULTS: Both superposition and homogeneity held for each physical gradient axis with errors less than 3%. When all gradients were on simultaneous sound prediction, error was reduced from 32% to 4% after time-shift correction. Transfer functions also showed high sensitivity to body habitus and microphone location.
CONCLUSION: The independent linear model predicts MRI acoustic noise with less than 4% error. Acoustic transfer functions are highly sensitive to body habitus and position within the bore, making it challenging to produce a general approach to acoustic noise reduction based on avoiding system resonance peaks.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; acoustic noise; frequency response; noise reduction; transfer function

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23757158      PMCID: PMC3795844          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of the pharyngeal airway by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  K Ikeda; M Ogura; T Oshima; H Suzuki; S Higano; S Takahashi; H Kurosawa; W Hida; H Matsuoka; T Takasaka
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Gradient-induced acoustic and magnetic field fluctuations in a 4T whole-body MR imager.

Authors:  Y Wu; B A Chronik; C Bowen; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Active acoustic control in gradient coils for MRI.

Authors:  P Mansfield; B Haywood; R Coxon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Making MRI quieter.

Authors:  William A Edelstein; Robert A Hedeen; Richard P Mallozzi; Sayed Amr El-Hamamsy; Robert A Ackermann; Timothy J Havens
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Active-passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction.

Authors:  William A Edelstein; Tesfaye K Kidane; Victor Taracila; Tanvir N Baig; Timothy P Eagan; Yu-Chung N Cheng; Robert W Brown; John A Mallick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.

Authors:  Shashikant R More; Teik C Lim; Mingfeng Li; Christy K Holland; Suzanne E Boyce; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.

Authors:  Carlos V Rizzo Sierra; Maarten J Versluis; Johannes M Hoogduin; Hendrikus Diek Duifhuis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers.

Authors:  R A Hedeen; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Improved sleep MRI at 3 tesla in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Lewis K Shin; Andrew B Holbrook; Robson Capasso; Clete A Kushida; Nelson B Powell; Nancy J Fischbein; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  Acoustic noise reduction in pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL).

Authors:  Johan N van der Meer; Dennis F R Heijtel; Guus van Hest; Geert-Jan Plattèl; Matthijs J P van Osch; Eus J W van Someren; Ed T vanBavel; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Dynamic Volume Computed Tomography Imaging of the Upper Airway in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Robert J Fleck; Stacey L Ishman; Sally R Shott; Ephraim J Gutmark; Keith B McConnell; Mohamed Mahmoud; Goutham Mylavarapu; Dhananjay R Subramaniam; Rhonda Szczesniak; Raouf S Amin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Upper Airway Narrowing during Central Apnea in Obese Adolescents.

Authors:  Roberta M Kato; Yoon-Chul Kim; Biswas Joshi; Shirleen Loloyan; Choo Phei Wee; Ziyue Wu; Winston H Tran; Thomas G Keens; Michael C K Khoo; Krishna S Nayak; Sally L Davidson Ward
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.