Literature DB >> 12034336

Making MRI quieter.

William A Edelstein1, Robert A Hedeen, Richard P Mallozzi, Sayed Amr El-Hamamsy, Robert A Ackermann, Timothy J Havens.   

Abstract

We have mitigated acoustic noise in a 1.5 T cylindrical MRI scanner equipped with epoxy-potted, shielded gradients. It has been widely assumed that MRI acoustic noise comes overwhelmingly from vibrations of the gradient assembly. However, with vibration-isolated gradients contained in an airtight enclosure, we found the primary sources of acoustic noise to be eddy-current-induced vibrations of metal structures such as the cryostat inner bore and the rf body coil. We have elucidated the relative strengths of source-pathways of acoustic noise and assembled a reduced-acoustic-noise demonstration MRI system. This scanner employed a number of acoustic noise reduction measures including a vacuum enclosure of a vibrationally isolated gradient assembly, a low-eddy-current rf coil and a non-conducting inner bore cryostat. The demonstration scanner reduced, by about 20 dBA, the acoustic noise levels in the patient bore to 85 dBA and below for several typical noisy pulse sequences. The noise level standing near the patient bore is 71 dBA and below. We have applied Statistical Energy Analysis to develop a vibroacoustic model of the MR system. Our model includes vibrational sources and acoustic pathways to predict acoustic noise and provides a good spectral match above 400 Hz to experimentally measured sound levels. This tool enables us to factor acoustics into the design parameters of new MRI systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12034336     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00475-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  30 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Characterization of vibration and acoustic noise in a gradient-coil insert.

Authors:  G Z Yao; C K Mechefske; B K Rutt
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Acoustic noise reduction in T 1- and proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Martin Ott; Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; David Grodzki; Björn Heismann; Peter Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Theoretical, numerical, and experimental modal analysis of a single-winding gradient coil insert cylinder.

Authors:  Chris K Mechefske; Fenglin Wang
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI.

Authors:  S Schmitter; E Diesch; M Amann; A Kroll; M Moayer; L R Schad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Javier Gonzalez Castillo; Joseph Santos; Sungeun Kim; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.