Literature DB >> 15844137

Active-passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction.

William A Edelstein1, Tesfaye K Kidane, Victor Taracila, Tanvir N Baig, Timothy P Eagan, Yu-Chung N Cheng, Robert W Brown, John A Mallick.   

Abstract

An important source of MRI acoustic noise-magnet cryostat warm-bore vibrations caused by eddy-current-induced forces-can be mitigated by a passive metal shield mounted on the outside of a vibration-isolated, vacuum-enclosed shielded gradient set. Finite-element (FE) calculations for a z-gradient indicate that a 2-mm-thick Cu layer wrapped on the gradient assembly can decrease mechanical power deposition in the warm bore and reduce warm-bore acoustic noise production by about 25 dB. Eliminating the conducting warm bore and other magnet parts as significant acoustic noise sources could lead to the development of truly quiet, fully functioning MRI systems with noise levels below 70 dB. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844137     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A numerically optimized active shield for improved transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Timothy Hall; Luis Gomez; Eric Michielssen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Gradient and shim technologies for ultra high field MRI.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Franz Schmitt; Hermann Landes; Joshua de Bever; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience.

Authors:  Sedat Alibek; Mika Vogel; Wei Sun; David Winkler; Christopher A Baker; Michael Burke; Hubertus Gloger
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Javier Gonzalez Castillo; Joseph Santos; Sungeun Kim; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Model gradient coil employing active acoustic control for MRI.

Authors:  B Haywood; B Chapman; P Mansfield
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Evaluation of an independent linear model for acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner and implications for acoustic noise reduction.

Authors:  Ziyue Wu; Yoon-Chul Kim; Michael C K Khoo; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Model for b1 imaging in MRI using the rotating RF field.

Authors:  Adnan Trakic; Jin Jin; Ewald Weber; Stuart Crozier
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Software-based noise reduction in cranial magnetic resonance imaging: Influence on image quality.

Authors:  Philipp Fuelkell; Soenke Langner; Nele Friedrich; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Christoph G Radosa; Ivan Platzek; Birger Mensel; Jens-Peter Kühn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.