Literature DB >> 27271536

Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.

Andrea L Shugar1,2, Nada Quercia3,4, Christopher Trevors5, Marina M Rabideau6, Sohnee Ahmed7.   

Abstract

With the increasing awareness of genetic contributions to disease in Canada, the availability of and demand for genetic testing has soared. Genetic counseling is becoming a recognized and rapidly growing (yet unregulated) health profession in Canada. We hypothesized that the potential risk for harm to the public posed by genetic counseling practice in the province of Ontario is sufficient to consider regulation. The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHTLC) sets criteria (both primary and secondary) to identify health professional bodies that meet the threshold for regulation in the province. We developed a survey based on the MOHTLC criteria to determine if genetic counselors meet the primary criteria to be considered for health professions regulation in Ontario. We surveyed 120 Ontario genetic counselors about their clinical practice and perceptions of risk for harm to the public. Results indicate that Ontario genetic counselors are highly independent in their clinical practice and are involved in patient care activities, clinical judgement and decision-making that have the potential to harm patients. In particular, cancer genetic counselors were identified as a cohort that practices with relatively high autonomy and low supervision. In summary, our study indicates that genetic counseling practice in Ontario meets the primary criteria to be considered for regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetics; Genetic counseling; Genetic counselor; Genetic testing; Genetics; Genomic medicine; Genomics; Health professions; Healthcare; Licensure; Medical genetics; Regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271536     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9983-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  45 in total

1.  Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine. As we move towards personalized medicine, it becomes more important to help patients understand genetic tests and make complex decisions about their health.

Authors:  Jon Weil
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Amendments to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991: major implications for health care professionals.

Authors:  Lonny J Rosen; Elyse Sunshine
Journal:  Health Law Can       Date:  2010-06

3.  Genetics: Fluent in DNA.

Authors:  Michael Eisenstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  How inclusion of genetic counselors on the research team can benefit translational science.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Significant changes to Ontario's Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 in effect.

Authors:  Kathryn Frelick; Jesstina McFadden
Journal:  Health Law Can       Date:  2009-10

6.  Genetic counseling practice in next generation sequencing research: implications for the ethical oversight of the informed consent process.

Authors:  Nathalie Egalite; Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Attitudes of medical genetics practitioners and psychiatrists toward communicating with patients about genetic risk for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Yi Zhou Zhou; Alex Wilde; Bettina Meiser; Philip B Mitchell; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Peter R Schofield
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.458

Review 9.  The growing role for genetic counseling in endocrinology.

Authors:  Ellen T Matloff; Rachel E Barnett
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 10.  Estimating the referral rate for cancer genetic assessment from a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  C Featherstone; A Colley; K Tucker; J Kirk; M B Barton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of pre-counseling telephone interviews before face-to-face genetic counseling in cancer genetics.

Authors:  Gaëlle Collet; Nathalie Parodi; Kevin Cassinari; Zoe Neviere; Fanny Cohen; Céline Gasnier; Afane Brahimi; François Lecoquierre; Jean-Christophe Thery; Isabelle Tennevet; Elodie Lacaze; Pascaline Berthet; Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Genetic counselors and legal recognition: A made-for-Canada approach.

Authors:  Deborah M Lambert; Dimitri Patrinos; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.