Literature DB >> 11261424

Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services.

S J Hayflick1, M P Eiff, L Carpenter, J Steinberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services.
METHODS: A randomized survey of physicians in the Pacific Northwest.
RESULTS: The greatest factor prompting a genetics referral was the patient's interest in the evaluation, and the most common reason not to obtain a consultation was the perception that it was of no benefit to the patient. Genetics consultation was rarely sought for a family history of cancer or for deafness, polycystic kidney disease, or congenital heart disease. Even when uncertain about relative risk, physicians usually counseled a patient themselves rather than referring to a specialist.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians need more education about the genetic component of many diseases to provide directly and to refer appropriately for genetics services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 11261424     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-199811000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

1.  Genetic consultation.

Authors:  R A Pagon; N B Hanson; W Neufeld-Kaiser; M L Covington
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; Justin Nash; Karen Siren; Charles Eaton; Larry Culpepper
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.

Authors:  Carol A Christianson; Karen Potter Powell; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Susan H Blanton; Jessica Bogacik; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  What's the harm? Genetic counselor perceptions of adverse effects of genetics service provision by non-genetics professionals.

Authors:  Tracy A Bensend; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Kristin B Niendorf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Family history in primary care pediatrics.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Family physicians' awareness and knowledge of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA).

Authors:  Amanda L Laedtke; Suzanne M O'Neill; Wendy S Rubinstein; Kristen J Vogel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A survey of genetic counselors' strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice.

Authors:  Matthew A Bower; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Michele Caggana; Carolyn Constantin; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Tracy L Trotter; Jean Amos Wilson; Margaret M McGovern
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Effectiveness of an online curriculum for medical students on genetics, genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Mary P Metcalf; T Bradley Tanner; Amanda Buchanan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.