Literature DB >> 23748599

Quantification of the proportion of motor neurons recruited by transcranial electrical stimulation during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Shunji Tsutsui1, Hiroshi Yamada, Hiroshi Hashizume, Akihito Minamide, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Munehito Yoshida.   

Abstract

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are widely used to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. However, they are much smaller and more variable in amplitude than responses evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation, suggesting that a limited number of spinal motor neurons to the target muscle are excited by transcranial stimulation. The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of motor neurons recruited during TcMEP monitoring under general anesthesia. In twenty patients who underwent thoracic and/or lumbar spinal surgery with TcMEP monitoring, the triple stimulation technique (TST) was applied to the unilateral upper arm intraoperatively. Total intravenous anesthesia was employed. Trains of four stimuli were delivered with maximal intensity and an inter-pulse interval of 1.5 ms. TST responses were recorded from the abductor digiti minimi muscle, and the negative peak amplitude and area were measured and compared between the TST test (two collisions between transcranial and proximal and distal peripheral stimulation) and control response (two collisions between two proximal and one distal peripheral stimulation). The highest degree of superimposition of the TST test and control responses was chosen from several trials per patient. The average ratios (test:control) were 17.1 % (range 1.8-38 %) for the amplitudes and 21.6 % (range 2.9-40 %) for the areas. The activity of approximately 80 % of the motor units to the target muscle cannot be detected by TcMEP monitoring. Therefore, changes in evoked potentials must be interpreted cautiously when assessing segmental motor function with TcMEP monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748599     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9480-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  20 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery.

Authors:  Neil R Malhotra; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  From the electrodiagnostics lab: where transcranial stimulation, H-reflexes and F-responses monitor cord function intraoperatively.

Authors:  Ronald E Leppanen
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Multimodality monitoring of the central nervous system using motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan; Daniel Janik; Leslie Jameson
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Temporal summation--the key to motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in humans.

Authors:  B A Taylor; M E Fennelly; A Taylor; J Farrell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description.

Authors:  M Taniguchi; C Cedzich; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.

Authors:  U Pechstein; C Cedzich; J Nadstawek; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The effects of propofol anesthesia on transcortical electric evoked potentials in the rat.

Authors:  B P Keller; S S Haghighi; J J Oro; G W Eggers
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials in children undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Franz J Frei; Sven E Ryhult; Ewald Duitmann; Carol C Hasler; Juerg Luetschg; Thomas O Erb
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts.

Authors:  Vedran Deletis; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  7 in total

1.  A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  Shuta Ushio; Shigenori Kawabata; Satoshi Sumiya; Tsuyoshi Kato; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hideto Nishi; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Neurophysiological assessment of spinal cord injuries in dogs using somatosensory and motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Maria Claudia Campos Mello Inglez de Souza; Ricardo José Rodriguez Ferreira; Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio; Julia Maria Matera
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 6.  Basic Principles and Recent Trends of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Prognostic value of transcranial facial nerve motor-evoked potentials in predicting facial nerve function following cerebellopontine angle tumorectomy.

Authors:  Hongmei Song; Chengyuan Ma; Dahai Xu; Mingxin Yu; Jiachun Feng; Lichao Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.