Literature DB >> 23742370

Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Oldooz Hazrati1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

Reverberation severely degrades speech intelligibility for cochlear implant (CI) users. The ideal reverberant mask (IRM), a binary mask for reverberation suppression which is computed using signal-to-reverberant ratio, was found to yield substantial intelligibility gains for CI users even in highly reverberant environments (e.g., T60 = 1.0 s). Motivated by the intelligibility improvements obtained from IRM, a monaural blind channel-selection criterion for reverberation suppression is proposed. The proposed channel-selection strategy is blind, meaning that prior knowledge of neither the room impulse response nor the anechoic signal is required. By the use of a residual signal obtained from linear prediction analysis of the reverberant signal, the residual-to-reverberant ratio (RRR) of individual frequency channels was employed as the channel-selection criterion. In each frame, the channels with RRR less than an adaptive threshold were retained while the rest were zeroed out. Performance of the proposed strategy was evaluated via intelligibility listening tests conducted with CI users in simulated rooms with two reverberation times of 0.6 and 0.8 s. The results indicate significant intelligibility improvements in both reverberant conditions (over 30 and 40 percentage points in T60 = 0.6 and 0.8 s, respectively). The improvement is comparable to that obtained with the IRM strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742370      PMCID: PMC3689789          DOI: 10.1121/1.4804313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

Review 2.  Effects of reverberation time on the cognitive load in speech communication: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  A Kjellberg
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  H J McDermott; C M McKay; A E Vandali
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Sarah F Poissant; Nathaniel A Whitmal; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski; F M Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Similarities of vowels in nonreverberant and reverberant fields.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; J M Pickett
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-12

8.  Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP).

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; T R Letowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1985-05

10.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Application of a Graphical Model to Investigate the Utility of Cross-channel Information for Mitigating Reverberation in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Lidea K Shahidi; Leslie M Collins; Boyla O Mainsah
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Mach Learn Appl       Date:  2019-01-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.