Literature DB >> 2808901

Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

A K Nábĕlek1, T R Letowski, F M Tucker.   

Abstract

Two effects of reverberation on the identification of consonants were evaluated for ten normal-hearing subjects: (1) the overlap of energy of a preceding consonant on the following consonant, called "overlap-masking"; and (2) the internal temporal smearing of energy within each consonant, called "self-masking." The stimuli were eight consonants/p,t,k,f,m,n,l,w/. The consonants were spoken in /s-at/context (experiment 1) and generated by a speech synthesizer in /s-at/ and/-at/contexts (experiment 2). In both experiments, identification of consonants was tested in four conditions: (1) quiet, without degradations; (2) with a babble of voices; (3) with noise that was shaped like either natural or synthetic/s/ for the two experiments, respectively; and (4) with room reverberation. The results for the natural and synthetic syllables indicated that the effect of reverberation on identification of consonants following/s/ was not comparable to masking by either the /s/ -spectrum-shaped noise or the babble. In addition, the results for the synthetic syllables indicated that most of the errors in reverberation for the /s-at/context were similar to a sum of errors in two conditions: (1) with /s/-shaped noise causing overlap masking; and (2) with reverberation causing self-masking within each consonant.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808901     DOI: 10.1121/1.398740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

3.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Using channel-specific statistical models to detect reverberation in cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Jill M Desmond; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.