Literature DB >> 3403805

Similarities of vowels in nonreverberant and reverberant fields.

A K Nábĕlek1, T R Letowski.   

Abstract

Perceptual distances among single tokens of American English vowels were established for nonreverberant and reverberant conditions. Fifteen vowels in the phonetic context (b-t), embedded in the sentence "Mark the (b-t) again" were recorded by a male talker. For the reverberant condition, the sentences were played through a room with a reverberation time of 1.2 s. The CVC syllables were removed from the sentences and presented in pairs to ten subjects with audiometrically normal hearing, who judged the similarity of the syllable pairs separately for the nonreverberant and reverberant conditions. The results were analyzed by multidimensional scaling procedures, which showed that the perceptual data were accounted for by a three-dimensional vowel space. Correlations were obtained between the coordinates of the vowels along each dimension and selected acoustic parameters. For both conditions, dimensions 1 and 2 were highly correlated with formant frequencies F2 and F1, respectively, and dimension 3 was correlated with the product of the duration of the vowels and the difference between F3 and F1 expressed on the Bark scale. These observations are discussed in terms of the influence of reverberation on speech perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3403805     DOI: 10.1121/1.396473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Using channel-specific statistical models to detect reverberation in cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Jill M Desmond; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Jaewook Lee; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.