Literature DB >> 8224578

Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP).

C M McKay1, H J McDermott.   

Abstract

A portable sound processor has been developed at the University of Melbourne for use with the 22-electrode cochlear implant manufactured by Cochlear Pty Limited. In this report, the performance of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) is compared with the Mini Speech Processor (MSP) presently used clinically with this implant. Results of tests with 5 subjects demonstrate that the performance of the SMSP significantly exceeds that of the MSP for recognizing vowels and consonants in closed-set confusion studies and open-set monosyllabic word tests, although recognition of speaker identity and intonation patterns is similar for both processors. Information transmission analysis of phoneme features confirms that most features, such as vowel format frequencies and consonant manner and place of articulation, are better conveyed with the SMSP. Possible reasons for its improved performance are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8224578     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199310000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Burton; Jennell Vick; Harlan Lane; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Development of digital hearing AIDS.

Authors:  C Schweitzer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-06

6.  Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Patricia K Dawson; Lamar Z Borden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

8.  Melodic Contour Training and Its Effect on Speech in Noise, Consonant Discrimination, and Prosody Perception for Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Chi Yhun Lo; Catherine M McMahon; Valerie Looi; William F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.