Literature DB >> 3990258

Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.

A K Nabelek, T R Letowski.   

Abstract

The effects of reverberation on the perception of vowels and diphthongs were evaluated using 10 subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Stimuli were 15 English vowels and diphthongs, spoken between/b/and/t/and recorded in a carrier sentence. The test was recorded without and with reverberation (T = 1.2 s). Although vowel confusions occurred in both test conditions, the number of vowels and diphthongs affected and the total number of errors made were significantly greater under the reverberant condition. The results indicated that the perception of vowels by hearing-impaired listeners can be influenced substantially by reverberation. Errors for vowels in reverberation seemed to be related to the overestimation of vowel duration and to a tendency to perceive the pitch of the formant frequencies as being higher than in vowels without reverberation. Error patterns were somewhat individualized among subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3990258     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5002.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Jaewook Lee; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Paul W Anderson; Ashley A Assgari; Gregory M Ellis; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Tackling the combined effects of reverberation and masking noise using ideal channel selection.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  An intrusive method for estimating speech intelligibility from noisy and distorted signals.

Authors:  Nursadul Mamun; Muhammad S A Zilany; John H L Hansen; Evelyn E Davies-Venn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.