Literature DB >> 23734788

Esophagogastric Junction pressure morphology: comparison between a station pull-through and real-time 3D-HRM representation.

F Nicodème1, Z Lin, J E Pandolfino, P J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) competence is the fundamental defense against reflux making it of great clinical significance. However, characterizing EGJ competence with conventional manometric methodologies has been confounded by its anatomic and physiological complexity. Recent technological advances in miniaturization and electronics have led to the development of a novel device that may overcome these challenges.
METHODS: Nine volunteer subjects were studied with a novel 3D-HRM device providing 7.5 mm axial and 45° radial pressure resolution within the EGJ. Real-time measurements were made at rest and compared to simulations of a conventional pull-through made with the same device. Moreover, 3D-HRM recordings were analyzed to differentiate contributing pressure signals within the EGJ attributable to lower esophageal sphincter (LES), diaphragm, and vasculature. KEY
RESULTS: 3D-HRM recordings suggested that sphincter length assessed by a pull-through method greatly exaggerated the estimate of LES length by failing to discriminate among circumferential contractile pressure and asymmetric extrinsic pressure signals attributable to diaphragmatic and vascular structures. Real-time 3D EGJ recordings found that the dominant constituents of EGJ pressure at rest were attributable to the diaphragm. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: 3D-HRM permits real-time recording of EGJ pressure morphology facilitating analysis of the EGJ constituents responsible for its function as a reflux barrier making it a promising tool in the study of GERD pathophysiology. The enhanced axial and radial recording resolution of the device should facilitate further studies to explore perturbations in the physiological constituents of EGJ pressure in health and disease.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophagogastric junction; gastroesophageal reflux disease; high pressure zone; lower esophageal sphincter; three-dimensional high-resolution manometry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23734788      PMCID: PMC3735634          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  17 in total

1.  Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi; L Haroian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Adding a radial dimension to the assessment of esophagogastric junction relaxation: validation studies of the 3D-eSleeve.

Authors:  Frédéric Nicodème; John E Pandolfino; Zhiyue Lin; Yinglian Xiao; Gabriela Escobar; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Instrumentation and methods for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  W J Dodds
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1976-05

4.  Resolving the three-dimensional myoarchitecture of bovine esophageal wall with diffusion spectrum imaging and tractography.

Authors:  Richard J Gilbert; Terry A Gaige; Ruopeng Wang; Thomas Benner; Guangping Dai; Jonathan N Glickman; Van J Wedeen
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael F Vaezi; Stephen W Hiltz; Edgar Black; Irvin M Modlin; Steve P Johnson; John Allen; Joel V Brill
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  The esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D H Balaban
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Electrical and mechanical activity in the human lower esophageal sphincter during diaphragmatic contraction.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D F Rochester; R W McCallum
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Sphincteric action of the diaphragm during a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter in humans.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D F Rochester; R W McCallum
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-01

9.  Effect of the diaphragmatic contraction on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in man.

Authors:  R K Mittal; D F Rochester; R W McCallum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Who benefits from antireflux surgery?

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Novel 3D high-resolution manometry metrics for quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Yinglian Xiao; Yuwen Li; John E Pandolfino; Minhu Chen; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The effect of incremental distal gastric myotomy lengths on EGJ distensibility during POEM for achalasia.

Authors:  Ezra N Teitelbaum; Joel M Sternbach; Rym El Khoury; Nathaniel J Soper; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Zhiyue Lin; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Functional lumen imaging of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Christian Lottrup; Hans Gregersen; Donghua Liao; Lotte Fynne; Jens Brøndum Frøkjær; Klaus Krogh; Julie Regan; Peter Kunwald; Barry P McMahon
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ-Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non-responders.

Authors:  F Nicodème; M Pipa-Muniz; K Khanna; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Calculation of esophagogastric junction vector volume using three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  F Nicodème; N J Soper; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.

Authors:  D Wang; A Patel; M Mello; A Shriver; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Lower esophageal sphincter pressure measurement under standardized inspiratory maneuveurs.

Authors:  Jeany Borges e Silva Ribeiro; Esther Cristina Arruda Oliveira Diógenes; Patrícia Carvalho Bezerra; Tanila Aguiar Andrade Coutinho; Cícera Geórgia Félix de Almeida; Miguel Ângelo Nobre e Souza
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 9.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Chicago Classification update (v4.0): Technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Ravinder K Mittal; Serhat Bor; Geoffrey P Kohn; Johannes Lenglinger; Sumeet K Mittal; John E Pandolfino; Jordi Serra; Roger Tatum; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.960

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.